Literature DB >> 18533770

Strategic extraction: a paradigm shift that is changing our profession.

Richard T Kao1.   

Abstract

The greatest challenge in treatment planning is to assign an accurate prognosis and develop a predictable protocol. In the era of evidence-based dentistry, outcome studies have forced us to reexamine our treatment approaches and decide if superior treatment options should be pursued. As endosseous dental implants gain greater acceptance because of high success rates, the critical question is whether a tooth with a questionable prognosis should be managed conservatively in a traditional fashion or be strategically extracted in preparation for a dental implant. The outcomes of traditional periodontal, endodontic, and prosthodontic treatment approaches are compared to the option of strategic extraction.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18533770     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  3 in total

1.  Are implants more reliable than severely compromised endodontically treated teeth as abutments for zirconia-based FPDs? : In vitro results of long-term preclinical load simulation.

Authors:  M Naumann; C Hohmann; A Happe; F Beuer; R Frankenberger; R Seemann; M Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Periodontal treatment in a generalized severe chronic periodontitis patient: A case report with 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Omer Birkan Agrali; Bahar Eren Kuru
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

3.  Histological, radiological, and clinical outcomes of sinus floor elevation using a lateral approach for pre-/post-extraction of the severely compromised maxillary molars: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhaoguo Yue; Qi Liu; Haidong Zhang; Jingwen Yang; Jianxia Hou
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.