BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Differences in soft-tissue stiffness may provide for a quantitative assessment and detection technique for pressure ulcers or deep-tissue injury. An ultrasound indentation system may provide a relatively convenient, simple, and noninvasive method for quantitative measurement of changes in soft-tissue stiffness in vivo. METHODS: The Tissue Ultrasound Palpation System (TUPS) was used to quantitatively measure changes in soft-tissue stiffness at different anatomical locations within and between able-bodied persons and individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The stiffness of soft tissue was measured at the ischial tuberosity, greater trochanter, posterior midthigh, and biceps brachii. Additionally, soft-tissue thickness and soft-tissue deformation were also measured. RESULTS: Significant differences in soft-tissue stiffness were observed within the various anatomical locations tested, in both the able-bodied and SCI groups. Differences in soft-tissue stiffness were also observed between the 2 groups. Participants with SCI had significantly softer tissue in their buttock-thigh area. CONCLUSIONS: TUPS is a clinically feasible technology that can reliably and effectively detect changes in soft-tissue stiffness. The study has provided a better understanding of the tissue mechanical response to external loading, specifically in the SCI population, suggesting the use of tissue stiffness as a parameter to detect and assess pressure-related soft-tissue injury.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Differences in soft-tissue stiffness may provide for a quantitative assessment and detection technique for pressure ulcers or deep-tissue injury. An ultrasound indentation system may provide a relatively convenient, simple, and noninvasive method for quantitative measurement of changes in soft-tissue stiffness in vivo. METHODS: The Tissue Ultrasound Palpation System (TUPS) was used to quantitatively measure changes in soft-tissue stiffness at different anatomical locations within and between able-bodied persons and individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The stiffness of soft tissue was measured at the ischial tuberosity, greater trochanter, posterior midthigh, and biceps brachii. Additionally, soft-tissue thickness and soft-tissue deformation were also measured. RESULTS: Significant differences in soft-tissue stiffness were observed within the various anatomical locations tested, in both the able-bodied and SCI groups. Differences in soft-tissue stiffness were also observed between the 2 groups. Participants with SCI had significantly softer tissue in their buttock-thigh area. CONCLUSIONS: TUPS is a clinically feasible technology that can reliably and effectively detect changes in soft-tissue stiffness. The study has provided a better understanding of the tissue mechanical response to external loading, specifically in the SCI population, suggesting the use of tissue stiffness as a parameter to detect and assess pressure-related soft-tissue injury.
Authors: Michael A Ankrom; Richard G Bennett; Stephen Sprigle; Diane Langemo; Joyce M Black; Dan R Berlowitz; Courtney H Lyder Journal: Adv Skin Wound Care Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.347
Authors: Sharon Gabison; Sunita Mathur; Ethne L Nussbaum; Milos R Popovic; Mary C Verrier Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Victoria Spartacus; Maedeh Shojaeizadeh; Vincent Raffault; James Shoults; Ken Van Wieren; Carolyn J Sparrey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Erica E Neumann; Tammy M Owings; Tyler Schimmoeller; Tara F Nagle; Robb W Colbrunn; Benjamin Landis; J Eric Jelovsek; Mike Wong; Joy P Ku; Ahmet Erdemir Journal: Sci Data Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 6.444