Literature DB >> 18533252

Size, charge and concentration dependent uptake of iron oxide particles by non-phagocytic cells.

Daniel L J Thorek1, Andrew Tsourkas.   

Abstract

A promising new direction for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging involves tracking the migration and biodistribution of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-labeled cells in vivo. Despite the large number of cell labeling studies that have been performed with SPIO particles of differing size and surface charge, it remains unclear which SPIO configuration provides optimal contrast in non-phagocytic cells. This is largely because contradictory findings have stemmed from the variability and imprecise control over surface charge, the general need and complexity of transfection and/or targeting agents, and the limited number of particle configurations examined in any given study. In the present study, we systematically evaluated the cellular uptake of SPIO in non-phagocytic T cells over a continuum of particle sizes ranging from 33nm to nearly 1.5microm, with precisely controlled surface properties, and without the need for transfection agents. SPIO labeling of T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry and contrast enhancement was determined by relaxometry. SPIO uptake was dose-dependent and exhibited sigmoidal charge dependence, which was shown to saturate at different levels of functionalization. Efficient labeling of cells was observed for particles up to 300nm, however, micron-sized particle uptake was limited. Our results show that an unconventional highly cationic particle configuration at 107nm maximized MR contrast of T cells, outperforming the widely utilized USPIO (<50nm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18533252      PMCID: PMC2518173          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  42 in total

1.  MRI detection of single particles for cellular imaging.

Authors:  Erik M Shapiro; Stanko Skrtic; Kathryn Sharer; Jonathan M Hill; Cynthia E Dunbar; Alan P Koretsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Instant MR labeling of stem cells using magnetoelectroporation.

Authors:  P Walczak; D A Kedziorek; A A Gilad; S Lin; J W M Bulte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Tracking stem cells in vivo.

Authors:  R Yoneyama; E R Chemaly; R J Hajjar
Journal:  Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop       Date:  2006

4.  Imaging islets labeled with magnetic nanoparticles at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Joo Ho Tai; Paula Foster; Alma Rosales; Biao Feng; Craig Hasilo; Violetta Martinez; Soha Ramadan; Jonatan Snir; C W James Melling; Savita Dhanvantari; Brian Rutt; David J G White
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Comparison of imaging techniques for tracking cardiac stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Sarah J Zhang; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  In vivo tracking in cardiac stem cell-based therapy.

Authors:  Kozo Hoshino; Hung Q Ly; John V Frangioni; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.194

7.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide: enhanced detection of focal splenic tumors with MR imaging.

Authors:  R Weissleder; P F Hahn; D D Stark; G Elizondo; S Saini; L E Todd; J Wittenberg; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Cell internalization of magnetic nanoparticles using transfection agents.

Authors:  Karin Montet-Abou; Xavier Montet; Ralph Weissleder; Lee Josephson
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.488

9.  Cell tagging with clinically approved iron oxides: feasibility and effect of lipofection, particle size, and surface coating on labeling efficiency.

Authors:  Lars Matuszewski; Thorsten Persigehl; Alexander Wall; Wolfram Schwindt; Bernd Tombach; Manfred Fobker; Christopher Poremba; Wolfgang Ebert; Walter Heindel; Christoph Bremer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Oligonucleotide loading determines cellular uptake of DNA-modified gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  David A Giljohann; Dwight S Seferos; Pinal C Patel; Jill E Millstone; Nathaniel L Rosi; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 11.189

View more
  92 in total

1.  An intein-mediated site-specific click conjugation strategy for improved tumor targeting of nanoparticle systems.

Authors:  Drew R Elias; Zhiliang Cheng; Andrew Tsourkas
Journal:  Small       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 13.281

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging probes for labeling of chondrocyte cells.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Chunchao Xia; Zhiyong Wang; Fei Lv; Fabao Gao; Qiyong Gong; Bin Song; Hua Ai; Zhongwei Gu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Magnetic nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging and diagnostics.

Authors:  Christine Rümenapp; Bernhard Gleich; Axel Haase
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  A new nano-sized iron oxide particle with high sensitivity for cellular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chih-Lung Chen; Haosen Zhang; Qing Ye; Wen-Yuan Hsieh; T Kevin Hitchens; Hsin-Hsin Shen; Li Liu; Yi-Jen Wu; Lesley M Foley; Shian-Jy Wang; Chien Ho
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Nanotechnology and stem cell therapy for cardiovascular diseases: potential applications.

Authors:  Saverio La Francesca
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2012-01

6.  Effects of nanoparticle size on cellular uptake and liver MRI with polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Lihong Bu; Jin Xie; Kai Chen; Zhen Cheng; Xingguo Li; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Labelling of mammalian cells for visualisation by MRI.

Authors:  Monique R Bernsen; Amber D Moelker; Piotr A Wielopolski; Sandra T van Tiel; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Impact of Serum Proteins on MRI Contrast Agents: Cellular Binding and T2 relaxation.

Authors:  Alexandra Hill; Christine K Payne
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.361

9.  Dextran coated bismuth-iron oxide nanohybrid contrast agents for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Pratap C Naha; Ajlan Al Zaki; Elizabeth Hecht; Michael Chorny; Peter Chhour; Eric Blankemeyer; Douglas M Yates; Walter R T Witschey; Harold I Litt; Andrew Tsourkas; David P Cormode
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 6.331

10.  MR reporter gene imaging of endostatin expression and therapy.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Kezheng Wang; Baozhong Shen; Tao Huang; Xilin Sun; Weihua Li; Gang Jin; Lin Li; Lihong Bu; Renfei Li; Dan Wang; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.