Literature DB >> 18528773

The effect of reused questions on repeat examinees.

Timothy J Wood1.   

Abstract

Reusing questions on an examination is a concern because test administrators do not want to unfairly aid examinees by exposing them to questions they have seen on previous examinations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect that prior exposure of questions has on the performance of repeat examinees. Two recent administrations of an examination repeated a block of 36 multiple-choice questions. Scores for 130 repeat examinees were analyzed. Examinee ability estimates on reused questions increased but estimates on non-reused questions also increased by an equal amount. Subsequent analyses compared the match between options chosen on the first and second attempts. There is a tendency to choose the same option but it does not appear to be due to examinees remembering questions. Repeat examinees do not appear to be advantaged by seeing reused questions.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18528773     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-008-9129-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  7 in total

1.  Three controversies over item disclosure in medical licensure examinations.

Authors:  Yoon Soo Park; Eunbae B Yang
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-09-14

2.  Effects of test item disclosure on medical licensing examination.

Authors:  Eunbae B Yang; Myung Ae Lee; Yoon Soo Park
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Re-using questions in classroom-based assessment: An exploratory study at the undergraduate medical education level.

Authors:  Sébastien Xavier Joncas; Christina St-Onge; Sylvie Bourque; Paul Farand
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2018-12

4.  Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.

Authors:  Nicolette Fozzard; Andrew Pearson; Eugene du Toit; Helen Naug; William Wen; Ian R Peak
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Rethinking gross anatomy in a compressed time frame: Clinical symptoms, not case studies, as the basis for introductory instruction.

Authors:  Sasha N Zill
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Upon Repeated Reflection: Consequences of Frequent Exposure to the Cognitive Reflection Test for Mechanical Turk Participants.

Authors:  Jan K Woike
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-06

7.  [Perceptions on item disclosure for the Korean medical licensing examination].

Authors:  Eunbae B Yang
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2015-08-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.