Literature DB >> 18525490

Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration.

Masashi Miyazaki1, Soon Woo Hong, Seung Hwan Yoon, Yuichiro Morishita, Jeffrey C Wang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a radiographic reliability study of a novel grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and test the reliability of a reproducible grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration on the basis of the routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical disc degeneration is common after middle age, and the morphology of cervical disc degenerative disease has often been studied using MRI. There are few specific MRI-based grading systems for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration despite the clinical importance of this problem. This study proposes a novel reproducible grading system for cervical disc degeneration and demonstrates the reliability of this classification scheme.
METHODS: A grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration was developed based on relevant previous literature. MRI grading of 300 cervical intervertebral discs using T2-weighted sagittal images was performed by 4 spinal surgeons (observers) in a blinded fashion. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were assessed by calculating kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Grade I degeneration was observed in 27 discs (9.0%); grade II, in 56 (18.7%); grade III, in 124 (41.3%); grade IV, in 67 (22.3%); and grade V, in 26 (8.7%) discs. Kappa coefficients for intraobserver and interobserver agreements ranged from substantial to excellent (intraobserver, 0.907 to 0.950 and interobserver, 0.730 to 0.826). Complete agreement was obtained, on an average, in 72.1% of the discs. A difference of 1, 2, and 3 grades was observed in 22.4%, 3.3%, and 0.2% discs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This grading system is comprehensive and easily applicable with sufficient reproducibility. It can be used as a common nomenclature for research and discussions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18525490     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31813c0e59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  48 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic changes after percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  June Ho Lee; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  The evaluation of cervical spine mobility without significant spondylosis by kMRI.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Akinobu Suzuki; Michael D Daubs; Trevor Scott; Kevin Phan; Jeffrey Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Skeletal Radiology: the year in review 2016.

Authors:  Daniel I Rosenthal; Mark Kransdorf; Gunnar Astrom
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.

Authors:  James Meacock; Moritz Schramm; Senthil Selvanathan; Stuart Currie; Deborah Stocken; David Jayne; Simon Thomson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Unintended fusion in cervical artificial disk replacement: a prospective study on heterotopic ossification, progression, and clinical outcome, with 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Catarina Marques; Anna MacDowall; Martin Skeppholm; Nuno Canto Moreira; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Rehydration of a degenerated disc on MRI synchronized with transition of Modic changes following stand-alone XLIF.

Authors:  Kenichiro Kita; Toshinori Sakai; Mitsunobu Abe; Yoichiro Takata; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Motion analysis of dynamic cervical implant stabilization versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a retrospective analysis of 70 cases.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Huarong Wu; Jin Chu; Mozhen Liu; Shuxun Hou; Shunzhi Yu; Tiesheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Yantao Zhao; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Jidong Guo; Huadong Wang; Li Li; Shuxun Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Role of growth differentiation factor-5 and bone morphogenetic protein type II receptor in the development of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Li; Xian-Zhong Tang; Chao-Ge Liang; Yao-Ming Hui; Yun-Han Ji; Wei Xu; WenJun Qiu; Li-Ming Cheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-01-01

10.  The NEtherlands Cervical Kinematics (NECK) trial. Cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double-blind randomised multicenter study.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.