Literature DB >> 18525395

Performance of oscillometric blood pressure devices in children in resource-poor settings.

Juan Jaime Miranda1, Sanja Stanojevic, Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz, Robert H Gilman, Liam Smeeth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare oscillometric blood pressure devices with mercury sphygmomanometry in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood pressure measurements were obtained with a mercury sphygmomanometer and one of two oscillometric devices. Correlations within each device and agreement between the two devices were evaluated.
RESULTS: In children, blood pressure measured by the oscillometric device was poorly correlated and had wide limits of agreements with the sphygmomanometer. Furthermore, the oscillometric devices overestimated systolic blood pressure in children with higher readings.
CONCLUSION: The applicability of automated blood pressure measuring devices in children has limitations and cannot be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18525395      PMCID： PMC2685878          DOI： 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f738b8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil        ISSN： 1741-8267


  6 in total

1.  Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  E O'Brien; B Waeber; G Parati; J Staessen; M G Myers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

Review 2.  Are pitfalls of oxcillometric blood pressure measurements preventable in children?

Authors:  Lavjay Butani; Bruce Z Morgenstern
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Recommendations for blood pressure measuring devices for office/clinic use in low resource settings.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Shanthi Mendis; Dele Abegunde; Ronald Asmar; Stephan Mieke; Alan Murray; Bakuti Shengelia; Gijs Steenvoorden; Gert Van Montfrans; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.444

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures.

Authors:  M K Park; S W Menard; C Yuan
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-01
  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Blood pressure is normal, but is the heart?

Authors:  Serkan Fazlı Çelik; Cemşit Karakurt; Yılmaz Tabel; Taner Elmas; Saim Yoloğlu
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Components of height and blood pressure in childhood.

Authors:  Nolwenn Regnault; Ken P Kleinman; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Claudia Langenberg; Steven E Lipshultz; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.

Authors:  Sigridur B Eliasdottir; Sandra D Steinthorsdottir; Olafur S Indridason; Runolfur Palsson; Vidar O Edvardsson
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Pre- and Perinatal Correlates of Ideal Cardiovascular Health during Early Childhood: A Prospective Analysis in the Healthy Start Study.

Authors:  Wei Perng; Ellen C Francis; Caylor Schuldt; Gregory Barbosa; Dana Dabelea; Katherine A Sauder
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 6.314

5.  Prevalence of high blood pressure among Canadian Children: 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines with the Canadian Health Measures Survey.

Authors:  Suzanne K Robinson; Celia J Rodd; Daniel L Metzger; Atul K Sharma
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.253
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.