BACKGROUND: To evaluate potential sex differences, this study aimed to investigate blood pressure and lipid control and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease in treated hypertensive (tHT) patients from primary healthcare. DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional survey of tHT patients was carried out between 2002 and 2005 by 264 primary care physicians from Sweden who consecutively recruited 6537 tHT patients (48% men and 52% women) from medical records. RESULTS: tHT men more often reached the treatment goal for systolic/diastolic blood pressure, less than 140/90 mmHg, than tHT women (30 vs. 26%, P<0.01). Men had lower systolic blood pressure than women, however, women had lower diastolic blood pressure and higher pulse pressure. More tHT women had total cholesterol>or=5.0 mmol/l than corresponding men (75 vs. 64% P<0.001). Men more often had diabetes (25 vs. 20% P<0.001), left ventricular hypertrophy (20 vs. 16% P<0.001), and microalbuminuria (24 vs. 16% P<0.001). Women were more often treated with diuretics (64 vs. 48%) and beta-receptor blockers (54 vs. 51%), and men more often treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (27 vs. 18%), calcium channel blockers (34 vs. 26%), and lipid-lowering drugs (34 vs. 29%). CONCLUSION: A need still exists for more intensified treatment of elevated blood pressure and hypercholesterolemia, especially in women. In hypertensives of both sexes, smoking and other risk factors also need to be addressed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate potential sex differences, this study aimed to investigate blood pressure and lipid control and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease in treated hypertensive (tHT) patients from primary healthcare. DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional survey of tHTpatients was carried out between 2002 and 2005 by 264 primary care physicians from Sweden who consecutively recruited 6537 tHTpatients (48% men and 52% women) from medical records. RESULTS:tHTmen more often reached the treatment goal for systolic/diastolic blood pressure, less than 140/90 mmHg, than tHTwomen (30 vs. 26%, P<0.01). Men had lower systolic blood pressure than women, however, women had lower diastolic blood pressure and higher pulse pressure. More tHTwomen had total cholesterol>or=5.0 mmol/l than corresponding men (75 vs. 64% P<0.001). Men more often had diabetes (25 vs. 20% P<0.001), left ventricular hypertrophy (20 vs. 16% P<0.001), and microalbuminuria (24 vs. 16% P<0.001). Women were more often treated with diuretics (64 vs. 48%) and beta-receptor blockers (54 vs. 51%), and men more often treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (27 vs. 18%), calcium channel blockers (34 vs. 26%), and lipid-lowering drugs (34 vs. 29%). CONCLUSION: A need still exists for more intensified treatment of elevated blood pressure and hypercholesterolemia, especially in women. In hypertensives of both sexes, smoking and other risk factors also need to be addressed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Authors: Robert Chen; Jimeng Sun; Robert S Dittus; Daniel Fabbri; Jacqueline Kirby; Cheryl L Laffer; Candace D McNaughton; Bradley Malin Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Susan Cheng; Brian Claggett; Andrew W Correia; Amil M Shah; Deepak K Gupta; Hicham Skali; Hanyu Ni; Wayne D Rosamond; Gerardo Heiss; Aaron R Folsom; Josef Coresh; Scott D Solomon Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Min Zhao; Mark Woodward; Ilonca Vaartjes; Elizabeth R C Millett; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Karice Hyun; Cheryl Carcel; Sanne A E Peters Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Maja S Paulsen; Morten Andersen; Janus L Thomsen; Henrik Schroll; Pia V Larsen; Jesper Lykkegaard; Ib A Jacobsen; Mogens L Larsen; Bo Christensen; Jens Sondergaard Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2012-12-31 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Ricardo Roa-Chamorro; Fernando Jaén-Águila; José Manuel Puerta-Puerta; Lucía Torres-Quintero; Pablo González-Bustos; Juan Diego Mediavilla-García Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 4.379