Literature DB >> 18524172

Comparison of tetraploid blastocyst microinjection of outbred Crl:CD1(ICR), hybrid B6D2F1/Tac, and inbred C57BL/6NTac embryos for generation of mice derived from embryonic stem cells.

Sharron M Kirchain1, Alison M Hayward, John M Mkandawire, Peimin Qi, Aurora A Burds.   

Abstract

Embryo electrofusion and tetraploid blastocyst microinjection is a modification of the traditional embryonic stem cell (ES cell)-based method to generate targeted mutant mice. Viability of tetraploid embryos is reportedly lower than with diploid embryos, with considerable interstrain variation. Here we assessed fetus and pup viability after ES cell microinjection of tetraploid blastocysts derived from outbred, hybrid, and inbred mice. Two-cell mouse embryos (C57BL/6NTac [B6], n = 788; B6D2F1/Tac [BDF1], n = 1871; Crl:CD1(ICR) [CD1], n = 1308) were electrofused; most resultant tetraploid blastocysts were injected with ES cells and surgically transferred into pseudopregnant recipient mice. Reproductive tracts were examined at midgestation for embryologic studies using B6 and BDF1 blastocysts; implantation sites and viable fetuses were counted. Pregnancies were carried to term for studies of targeted mutant mice using BDF1 and CD1 blastocysts, and pup yield was evaluated. Electrofusion rates of 2-cell embryos did not differ among B6, BDF1, and CD1 mice (overall mean, 92.8% +/- 5.4%). For embryologic studies, 244 B6 blastocysts were surgically transferred and 1 fetus was viable (0.41%), compared with 644 BDF1 blastocysts surgically transferred and 88 viable fetuses (13.7%). For targeted mutant mouse studies, 259 BDF1 blastocysts were surgically transferred yielding 10 pups (3.9%); 569 CD1 blastocysts yielded 44 pups (7.7%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18524172      PMCID: PMC2703175     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Med        ISSN: 1532-0820            Impact factor:   0.982


  22 in total

Review 1.  Technical assessment of the first 20 years of research using mouse embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Gregory J Downing; James F Battey
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  Establishment of a new embryonic stem cell line derived from C57BL/6 mouse expressing EGFP ubiquitously.

Authors:  Rie Shimizukawa; Aya Sakata; Michiko Hirose; Akio Takahashi; Hiroyoshi Iseki; Ying Liu; Satoshi Kunita; Fumihiro Sugiyama; Ken-ichi Yagami
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 3.  Altering mice by homologous recombination using embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  S K Bronson; O Smithies
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-11-04       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Developmental potential and behavior of tetraploid cells in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Guy S Eakin; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis; Virginia E Papaioannou; Richard R Behringer
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Generation of completely embryonic stem cell-derived mutant mice using tetraploid blastocyst injection.

Authors:  Z Q Wang; F Kiefer; P Urbánek; E F Wagner
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.882

6.  The genetic heterozygosity and fitness of tetraploid embryos and embryonic stem cells are crucial parameters influencing survival of mice derived from embryonic stem cells by tetraploid embryo aggregation.

Authors:  Xiangyun Li; Wei Wei; Jun Yong; Qing Jia; Yuansong Yu; Keqian Di
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Tetraploid cells of enhanced green fluorescent protein transgenic mice in tetraploid/diploid-chimeric embryos.

Authors:  Naomi Ishiguro; Kiyoshi Kano; Yoshio Yamamoto; Kazuyuki Taniguchi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  A Nagy; J Rossant; R Nagy; W Abramow-Newerly; J C Roder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  To knockout in 129 or in C57BL/6: that is the question.

Authors:  Eunju Seong; Thomas L Saunders; Colin L Stewart; Margit Burmeister
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Generation of single-copy transgenic mouse embryos directly from ES cells by tetraploid embryo complementation.

Authors:  R P Misra; S K Bronson; Q Xiao; W Garrison; J Li; R Zhao; S A Duncan
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2001-12-18       Impact factor: 2.563

View more
  4 in total

1.  Production of mice using iPS cells and tetraploid complementation.

Authors:  Xiao-Yang Zhao; Zhuo Lv; Wei Li; Fanyi Zeng; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Germline competence of mouse ES and iPS cell lines: Chimera technologies and genetic background.

Authors:  Ana Claudia Carstea; Melinda K Pirity; Andras Dinnyes
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Haploidy in somatic cells is induced by mature oocytes in mice.

Authors:  Yeonmi Lee; Aysha Trout; Nuria Marti-Gutierrez; Seoon Kang; Philip Xie; Aleksei Mikhalchenko; Bitnara Kim; Jiwan Choi; Seongjun So; Jongsuk Han; Jing Xu; Amy Koski; Hong Ma; Junchul David Yoon; Crystal Van Dyken; Hayley Darby; Dan Liang; Ying Li; Rebecca Tippner-Hedges; Fuhua Xu; Paula Amato; Gianpiero D Palermo; Shoukhrat Mitalipov; Eunju Kang
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-01-25

4.  Embryonic Stem Cell Culture Conditions Support Distinct States Associated with Different Developmental Stages and Potency.

Authors:  Javier Martin Gonzalez; Sophie M Morgani; Robert A Bone; Kasper Bonderup; Sahar Abelchian; Cord Brakebusch; Joshua M Brickman
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 7.765

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.