Literature DB >> 21607104

Germline competence of mouse ES and iPS cell lines: Chimera technologies and genetic background.

Ana Claudia Carstea1, Melinda K Pirity, Andras Dinnyes.   

Abstract

In mice, gene targeting by homologous recombination continues to play an essential role in the understanding of functional genomics. This strategy allows precise location of the site of transgene integration and is most commonly used to ablate gene expression ("knock-out"), or to introduce mutant or modified alleles at the locus of interest ("knock-in"). The efficacy of producing live, transgenic mice challenges our understanding of this complex process, and of the factors which influence germline competence of embryonic stem cell lines. Increasingly, evidence indicates that culture conditions and in vitro manipulation can affect the germline-competence of Embryonic Stem cell (ES cell) lines by accumulation of chromosome abnormalities and/or epigenetic alterations of the ES cell genome. The effectiveness of ES cell derivation is greatly strain-dependent and it may also influence the germline transmission capability. Recent technical improvements in the production of germline chimeras have been focused on means of generating ES cells lines with a higher germline potential. There are a number of options for generating chimeras from ES cells (ES chimera mice); however, each method has its advantages and disadvantages. Recent developments in induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell technology have opened new avenues for generation of animals from genetically modified somatic cells by means of chimera technologies. The aim of this review is to give a brief account of how the factors mentioned above are influencing the germline transmission capacity and the developmental potential of mouse pluripotent stem cell lines. The most recent methods for generating specifically ES and iPS chimera mice, including the advantages and disadvantages of each method are also discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chimeras; Embryonic stem cells; Epigenetic changes; Germline competence; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Transgenic

Year:  2009        PMID: 21607104      PMCID: PMC3097913          DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v1.i1.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Stem Cells        ISSN: 1948-0210            Impact factor:   5.326


  66 in total

1.  Utility of a C57BL/6 ES line versus 129 ES lines for targeted mutations in mice.

Authors:  Carol B Ware; La' Akea N Siverts; Angelique M Nelson; John F Morton; Warren C Ladiges
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Generation of mice derived from embryonic stem cells using blastocysts of different developmental ages.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ohta; Yuko Sakaide; Teruhiko Wakayama
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis.

Authors:  Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Jacob Hanna; Xiaolan Zhang; Manching Ku; Marius Wernig; Patrick Schorderet; Bradley E Bernstein; Rudolf Jaenisch; Eric S Lander; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution.

Authors:  Nimet Maherali; Rupa Sridharan; Wei Xie; Jochen Utikal; Sarah Eminli; Katrin Arnold; Matthias Stadtfeld; Robin Yachechko; Jason Tchieu; Rudolf Jaenisch; Kathrin Plath; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors.

Authors:  Keisuke Okita; Masato Nakagawa; Hong Hyenjong; Tomoko Ichisaka; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Trond Aasen; Angel Raya; Maria J Barrero; Elena Garreta; Antonella Consiglio; Federico Gonzalez; Rita Vassena; Josipa Bilić; Vladimir Pekarik; Gustavo Tiscornia; Michael Edel; Stéphanie Boué; Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Derivation and comparison of C57BL/6 embryonic stem cells to a widely used 129 embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Levent Keskintepe; Karen Norris; Gabriela Pacholczyk; Suzanne Morris Dederscheck; Ali Eroglu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Efficient production of mice from embryonic stem cells injected into four- or eight-cell embryos by piezo micromanipulation.

Authors:  Junjiu Huang; Kai Deng; Haojia Wu; Zhong Liu; Zhisheng Chen; Shanbo Cao; Lingjun Zhou; Xiaoying Ye; David L Keefe; Lin Liu
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  Tetraploid development in the mouse.

Authors:  Guy S Eakin; Richard R Behringer
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.780

10.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Masato Nakagawa; Michiyo Koyanagi; Koji Tanabe; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Tomoko Ichisaka; Takashi Aoi; Keisuke Okita; Yuji Mochiduki; Nanako Takizawa; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of nuclear transfer embryo-derived mouse embryonic stem cells. Part I: cellular characterization.

Authors:  Julianna Kobolak; Solomon Mamo; Ruttachuk Rungsiwiwut; Olga Ujhelly; Erika Csonka; Gyula Hadlaczky; Andras Dinnyes
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  Reviving rare chicken breeds using genetically engineered sterility in surrogate host birds.

Authors:  Mark E Woodcock; Almas A Gheyas; Andrew S Mason; Sunil Nandi; Lorna Taylor; Adrian Sherman; Jacqueline Smith; Dave W Burt; Rachel Hawken; Michael J McGrew
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Germline transmission of a novel rat embryonic stem cell line derived from transgenic rats.

Authors:  Hongsheng Men; Beth A Bauer; Elizabeth C Bryda
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 4.  New and old technologies for organ replacement.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Platt; Marilia Cascalho
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  A method to generate enhanced GFP+ chimeric mice to study the role of bone marrow-derived cells in the eye.

Authors:  Vivek Singh; Ritika Jaini; André A M Torricelli; Vincent K Tuohy; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Blastocyst complementation using Prdm14-deficient rats enables efficient germline transmission and generation of functional mouse spermatids in rats.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kobayashi; Teppei Goto; Mami Oikawa; Makoto Sanbo; Fumika Yoshida; Reiko Terada; Naoko Niizeki; Naoyo Kajitani; Kanako Kazuki; Yasuhiro Kazuki; Shinichi Hochi; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; M Azim Surani; Masumi Hirabayashi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Derivation of a germline competent transgenic Fischer 344 embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Hongsheng Men; Elizabeth C Bryda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Contribution of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Chimeras through Injection and Coculture of Embryos.

Authors:  Jitong Guo; Baojiang Wu; Shuyu Li; Siqin Bao; Lixia Zhao; Shuxiang Hu; Wei Sun; Jie Su; Yanfeng Dai; Xihe Li
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.443

9.  Trisomy 8: a common finding in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines.

Authors:  Young Mi Kim; Ji-Yun Lee; Lijun Xia; John J Mulvihill; Shibo Li
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 10.  Evolving Role of RING1 and YY1 Binding Protein in the Regulation of Germ-Cell-Specific Transcription.

Authors:  Izabella Bajusz; Surya Henry; Enikő Sutus; Gergő Kovács; Melinda K Pirity
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.