| Literature DB >> 18523637 |
Andrew J Pask1, Kerry J McInnes, David R Webb, Roger V Short.
Abstract
With the growing incidence of HIV, there is a desperate need to develop simple, cheap and effective new ways of preventing HIV infection. Male circumcision reduces the risk of infection by about 60%, probably because of the removal of the Langerhans cells which are abundant in the inner foreskin and are the primary route by which HIV enters the penis. Langerhans cells form a vital part of the body's natural defence against HIV and only cause infection when they are exposed to high levels of HIV virions. Rather than removing this natural defence mechanism by circumcision, it may be better to enhance it by thickening the layer of keratin overlying the Langerhans cells, thereby reducing the viral load to which they are exposed. We have investigated the ability of topically administered oestrogen to induce keratinization of the epithelium of the inner foreskin. Histochemically, the whole of the foreskin is richly supplied with oestrogen receptors. The epithelium of the inner foreskin, like the vagina, responds within 24 hours to the topical administration of oestriol by keratinization, and the response persists for at least 5 days after the cessation of the treatment. Oestriol, a cheap, readily available natural oestrogen metabolite, rapidly keratinizes the inner foreskin, the site of HIV entry into the penis. This thickening of the overlying protective layer of keratin should reduce the exposure of the underlying Langerhans cells to HIV virions. This simple treatment could become an adjunct or alternative to surgical circumcision for reducing the incidence of HIV infection in men.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18523637 PMCID: PMC2396280 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002308
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1ERα (α) and ERβ (β) protein distribution (brown staining) in the inner and outer aspects of the foreskin.
ERα staining was strongest in the stratum granulosum cells (black arrowheads) and in the stratum basale (red arrowheads) with weakest staining in the stratum spinosum. Natural variation in the thickness of the keratin layer is evident between samples (black bars). ERβ shows a similar localisation, but was more prevalent in the dermis than ERα. Negative controls were incubated without primary antibody and with an equivalent amount of non-specific rabbit IgG; as expected there was no staining observed. Melanocytes are present in some sections as histologically dark cells found at the base of the epidermis (yellow arrowheads) and do not indicate staining. Enlarged panels show characteristic cytoplasmic, nuclear and peri-nuclear staining for ERα and ERβ in the epithelium.
Figure 2Quantification of desquamated keratin from contact smears.
The mean amount of desquamated keratin was calculated for each individual for each treatment period. A highly significant increase in keratin was observed between the 4-day pre-treatment (Pre) and the 14-day treatment periods (Standard T-test; p = 0·002 individual 1 and p = 0·00003 individual 2 indicated by *). A significant increase in keratin was maintained over the 5-day post treatment period (Post) (p = 0·02 for individual 1 and p = 0·01 for individual 2 as indicated by **).