Thomas C Quinn1. 1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. tquinn@jhmi.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the recent literature on male circumcision and its effect on HIV acquisition. RECENT FINDINGS: The report from the randomized clinical trial of male circumcision in South Africa demonstrating a 60% protective effect in preventing HIV acquisition provided the first clinical trial evidence of efficacy of male circumcision in protecting men against HIV infection. This protective effect was consistent with both ecological and epidemiologic studies which also show a protective effect of 50-70% in men at high risk for HIV infection. Biological studies also demonstrate an increased number of HIV receptor cells in the mucosa of foreskin providing additional evidence of HIV susceptibility in the uncircumcised male. Male circumcision may also have a beneficial effect in preventing HIV acquisition in women and lowering selected sexually transmitted infections in both sexes. SUMMARY: The results of two ongoing randomized clinical trials of male circumcision in Kenya and Uganda are awaited with interest, however male circumcision should be carefully considered as a potential public health tool in preventing HIV acquisition. If other trials confirm the results of the South African trial, implementation of this surgical procedure will need to be carefully scaled up and integrated into other prevention programs with emphasis on surgical training, aseptic techniques, acceptability, availability and cultural considerations.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the recent literature on male circumcision and its effect on HIV acquisition. RECENT FINDINGS: The report from the randomized clinical trial of male circumcision in South Africa demonstrating a 60% protective effect in preventing HIV acquisition provided the first clinical trial evidence of efficacy of male circumcision in protecting men against HIV infection. This protective effect was consistent with both ecological and epidemiologic studies which also show a protective effect of 50-70% in men at high risk for HIV infection. Biological studies also demonstrate an increased number of HIV receptor cells in the mucosa of foreskin providing additional evidence of HIV susceptibility in the uncircumcised male. Male circumcision may also have a beneficial effect in preventing HIV acquisition in women and lowering selected sexually transmitted infections in both sexes. SUMMARY: The results of two ongoing randomized clinical trials of male circumcision in Kenya and Uganda are awaited with interest, however male circumcision should be carefully considered as a potential public health tool in preventing HIV acquisition. If other trials confirm the results of the South African trial, implementation of this surgical procedure will need to be carefully scaled up and integrated into other prevention programs with emphasis on surgical training, aseptic techniques, acceptability, availability and cultural considerations.
Authors: Ouzama Nicholson; Fay DiCandilo; James Kublin; Xiao Sun; Erin Quirk; Michelle Miller; Glenda Gray; Jean Pape; Michael N Robertson; Devan V Mehrotra; Steven Self; Katherine Turner; Jorge Sanchez; Punnee Pitisuttithum; Ann Duerr; Sheri Dubey; Lisa Kierstead; Danilo Casimiro; Scott M Hammer For The Merck V/Hiv Vaccine Trials Network Study Team Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Reuben Granich; Somya Gupta; Amitabh B Suthar; Caoimhe Smyth; David Hoos; Marco Vitoria; Mariangela Simao; Catherine Hankins; Bernard Schwartlander; Renee Ridzon; Brigitte Bazin; Brian Williams; Ying-Ru Lo; Craig McClure; Julio Montaner; Gottfried Hirnschall Journal: Curr HIV Res Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 1.581
Authors: Ronald A Brooks; Mark Etzel; Lee E Klosinski; Arleen A Leibowitz; Sharif Sawires; Greg Szekeres; Mark Weston; Thomas J Coates Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2009-02-11