Literature DB >> 18521218

A Randomized Comparison of two Short Intensive Chemotherapy Regimens in Children and Young Adults With Osteosarcoma: Results in Patients With Metastases: A Study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup.

V H Bramwell1, M V Burgers, R L Souhami, A H Taminiau, J W Van Der Eijken, A W Craft, A J Malcolm, B Uscinska, A L Kirkpatrick, D Machin, M M Van Glabbeke.   

Abstract

Purpose. To report the outcome of 37 patients with metastatic osteosarcoma entered into a large randomized trial (EOI 80831/MRC B002) comparing two different regimens of chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma.Methods. Patients with biopsy-proven osteosarcoma localized and metastatic, age 40 years or younger, were randomized to receive either two-drug treatment with doxorubicin/cisplatin (DOX 25 mg m(-2) day(-1) x 3 + DDP 100 mg m(-2) on day 1 q 3 weeks x 6 courses) or three-drug treatment comprising high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX 8 mg m(-2) administered every 4.5 weeks x 4 courses) given 10 days before DOX/DDP.Results. Twenty-four patients with metastatic disease received the two-drug arm treatment and 13 received three-drug treatment. Despite chance imbalance in numbers, there were no major differences in age, sex, primary site or performance status. Baseline alkaline phosphatase (AP) was elevated more frequently (96 vs 42%) in the two-drug arm. Twenty-one of 24 patients in the two-drug arm and 11/13 patients in the three-drug arm had evaluable primary tumors concurrent with metastases. Respective clinical response rates for the two- and three-drug arms were 48% and 40% for primary tumors, and 33% and 55% for metastases. Respective survivals at 2 and 4 years were 36% and 9% for the two-drug arm, and 69% and 52% for the three-drug arm, and survival was better for patients with normal AP at presentation. When adjusted for AP, survival was not significantly different between the two treatments (hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.22-1.23, p = 0.14). There were three long-term survivors among the metastatic patients, all of whom received the three-drug therapy.Discussion. It is likely that random bias in the population (small numbers, imbalance in size of groups, uneven distribution of AP) accounts for the difference in outcome favoring the three-drug treatment in patients with metastatic disease. More reliance can be placed on the finding that disease-free and overall survival in the adjuvant component of this study (Bramwell et al., J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 1579-91) were better after two-drug treatment.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 18521218      PMCID: PMC2395371          DOI: 10.1080/13577149778245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sarcoma        ISSN: 1357-714X


  13 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: results of a randomized cooperative trial (COSS-82) with salvage chemotherapy based on histological tumor response.

Authors:  K Winkler; G Beron; G Delling; U Heise; H Kabisch; C Purfürst; J Berger; J Ritter; H Jürgens; V Gerein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Methotrexate: clinical pharmacology, current status and therapeutic guidelines.

Authors:  W A Bleyer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 3.  The role of chemotherapy in osteogenic sarcoma.

Authors:  V H Bramwell
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: an investigative method, not a recipe.

Authors:  G Rosen; A Nirenberg
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1982-09

Review 5.  The dilemma of adjuvant chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma.

Authors:  S K Carter
Journal:  Cancer Clin Trials       Date:  1980

6.  Weekly high-dose methotrexate-citrovorum factor in osteogenic sarcoma: pre-surgical treatment of primary tumor and of overt pulmonary metastases.

Authors:  N Jaffe; E Frei; D Traggis; H Watts
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Primary chemotherapy and delayed surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) for osteosarcoma of the extremities. The Istituto Rizzoli Experience in 127 patients treated preoperatively with intravenous methotrexate (high versus moderate doses) and intraarterial cisplatin.

Authors:  G Bacci; P Picci; P Ruggieri; M Mercuri; M Avella; R Capanna; A Brach Del Prever; A Mancini; F Gherlinzoni; G Padovani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  A comparison of two short intensive adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in operable osteosarcoma of limbs in children and young adults: the first study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup.

Authors:  V H Bramwell; M Burgers; R Sneath; R Souhami; A T van Oosterom; P A Voûte; J Rouesse; D Spooner; A W Craft; R Somers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Osteogenic sarcoma with clinically detectable metastasis at initial presentation.

Authors:  P A Meyers; G Heller; J H Healey; A Huvos; A Applewhite; M Sun; M LaQuaglia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Osteosarcoma of the extremity metastatic at presentation: results achieved in 26 patients treated with combined therapy (primary chemotherapy followed by simultaneous resection of the primary and metastatic lesions).

Authors:  G Bacci; P Picci; A Briccoli; M Avella; S Ferrari; F P Femino; C Monti; P Ruggieri; A G Rizzente; R Casadei
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1992-06-30
View more
  6 in total

1.  Chemotherapy response analysis for osteosarcom with intra-arterial chemotherapy by subcutaneous implantable delivery system.

Authors:  Dingfeng Li; Qiu Cui; Yaosheng Liu; Xiaohong Wang; Cheng Liu; Shubin Liu; Yanjun Zeng
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  Advancing therapy for osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jonathan Gill; Richard Gorlick
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Patterns of care and survival for patients aged under 40 years with bone sarcoma in Britain, 1980-1994.

Authors:  C A Stiller; S J Passmore; M E Kroll; P A Brownbill; J C Wallis; A W Craft
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Outcome of surgical treatment of pelvic osteosarcoma: hospital universiti sains malaysia experience.

Authors:  Ms Ariff; W Zulmi; Wi Faisham; Mz Nor Azman; Ah Nawaz
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2013-03

Review 5.  The efficacy and safety comparison of first-line chemotherapeutic agents (high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide) for osteosarcoma: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Yan Zhang; Rongzhen Li; Jiazhen Li; Xinchang Lu; Yi Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Treating metastatic soft-tissue or bone sarcomas - potential role of ridaforolimus.

Authors:  Vicki L Keedy
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.