Literature DB >> 18519615

Assessment of the effectiveness of the studio format in introductory undergraduate biology.

Beth A Montelone1, David A Rintoul, Larry G Williams.   

Abstract

Kansas State University converted its introductory biology course, previously taught as an audio-tutorial (A-T), to a studio format in 1997. We share with others information about the process involved and present assessment data for the studio format course that address 1) student exam performance in A-T and studio; 2) student course grades in A-T and studio; 3) student and instructor perceptions and attitudes for A-T and studio; 4) student performance in subsequent biology courses for A-T and studio; and 5) gains in student learning for the studio course and other traditional lecture/lab courses. Collectively, these measures demonstrate that the studio format is as effective as or more effective (for some measures) than the A-T approach and traditional approaches in providing an effective learning environment. We discuss the issues involved in comparing course formats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18519615      PMCID: PMC2424303          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  2 in total

1.  Education. Scientific teaching.

Authors:  Jo Handelsman; Diane Ebert-May; Robert Beichner; Peter Bruns; Amy Chang; Robert DeHaan; Jim Gentile; Sarah Lauffer; James Stewart; Shirley M Tilghman; William B Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cooperative learning in industrial-sized biology classes.

Authors:  Norris Armstrong; Shu-Mei Chang; Marguerite Brickman
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.