Literature DB >> 18516606

Power and metabolic scope of bird flight: a phylogenetic analysis of biomechanical predictions.

Anders Hedenström1.   

Abstract

For flying animals aerodynamic theory predicts that mechanical power required to fly scales as P proportional, variant m (7/6) in a series of isometric birds, and that the flight metabolic scope (P/BMR; BMR is basal metabolic rate) scales as P (scope) proportional, variant m (5/12). I tested these predictions by using phylogenetic independent contrasts from a set of 20 bird species, where flight metabolic rate was measured during laboratory conditions (mainly in wind tunnels). The body mass scaling exponent for P was 0.90, significantly lower than the predicted 7/6. This is partially due to the fact that real birds show an allometric scaling of wing span, which reduces flight cost. P (scope) was estimated using direct measurements of BMR in combination with allometric equations. The body mass scaling of P (scope) ranged between 0.31 and 0.51 for three data sets, respectively, and none differed significantly from the prediction of 5/12. Body mass scaling exponents of P (scope) differed significantly from 0 in all cases, and so P (scope) showed a positive body mass scaling in birds in accordance with the prediction.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18516606     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0345-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  16 in total

Review 1.  The maximum oxygen consumption and aerobic scope of birds and mammals: getting to the heart of the matter.

Authors:  C M Bishop
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Maximal sustained energy budgets in humans and animals.

Authors:  K A Hammond; J Diamond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Carrying large fuel loads during sustained bird flight is cheaper than expected.

Authors:  A Kvist; M Green; T Piersma; G H Visser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Metabolism during flight in the laughing gull, Larus atricilla.

Authors:  V A Tucker
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1972-02

5.  Regulation of oxygen consumption and body temperature during torpor in a hummingbird, Eulampis jugularis.

Authors:  F R Hainsworth; L L Wolf
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Comparative power curves in bird flight.

Authors:  B W Tobalske; T L Hedrick; K P Dial; A A Biewener
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Passerines versus nonpasserines: so far, no statistical differences in the scaling of avian energetics.

Authors:  Enrico L Rezende; David L Swanson; F Fernando Novoa; Francisco Bozinovic
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Metabolic power, mechanical power and efficiency during wind tunnel flight by the European starling Sturnus vulgaris.

Authors:  S Ward; U Möller; J M Rayner; D M Jackson; D Bilo; W Nachtigall; J R Speakman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Heart rate and the rate of oxygen consumption of flying and walking barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis) and bar-headed geese (Anser indicus).

Authors:  S Ward; C M Bishop; A J Woakes; P J Butler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Gas exchange and energy cost of flight in the white-necked raven, Corvus cryptoleucus.

Authors:  D M Hudson; M H Bernstein
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  1 in total

1.  Extreme endurance migration: what is the limit to non-stop flight?

Authors:  Anders Hedenström
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 8.029

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.