Literature DB >> 12540899

Comparative power curves in bird flight.

B W Tobalske1, T L Hedrick, K P Dial, A A Biewener.   

Abstract

The relationship between mechanical power output and forward velocity in bird flight is controversial, bearing on the comparative physiology and ecology of locomotion. Applied to flying birds, aerodynamic theory predicts that mechanical power should vary as a function of forward velocity in a U-shaped curve. The only empirical test of this theory, using the black-billed magpie (Pica pica), suggests that the mechanical power curve is relatively flat over intermediate velocities. Here, by integrating in vivo measurements of pectoralis force and length change with quasi-steady aerodynamic models developed using data on wing and body movement, we present mechanical power curves for cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) and ringed turtle-doves (Streptopelia risoria). In contrast to the curve reported for magpies, the power curve for cockatiels is acutely concave, whereas that for doves is intermediate in shape and shows higher mass-specific power output at most speeds. We also find that wing-beat frequency and mechanical power output do not necessarily share minima in flying birds. Thus, aspects of morphology, wing kinematics and overall style of flight can greatly affect the magnitude and shape of a species' power curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12540899     DOI: 10.1038/nature01284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  51 in total

1.  Avian origins revisited.

Authors:  Domonique G Homberger
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Pigeons steer like helicopters and generate down- and upstroke lift during low speed turns.

Authors:  Ivo G Ros; Lori C Bassman; Marc A Badger; Alyssa N Pierson; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Neuromuscular control of wingbeat kinematics in Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Kenneth C Welch; Brian H Cho; Danny B Welch; Amy F Lin; William B Dickson; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Bigger is not always better: when brains get smaller.

Authors:  Kamran Safi; Marc A Seid; Dina K N Dechmann
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Metabolic costs of avian flight in relation to flight velocity: a study in Rose Coloured Starlings (Sturnus roseus, Linnaeus).

Authors:  Sophia Engel; Herbert Biebach; G Henk Visser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 2.200

6.  Adaptations to migration in birds: behavioural strategies, morphology and scaling effects.

Authors:  Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Similar movements are associated with drastically different muscle contraction velocities.

Authors:  Daniel A Hagen; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Lift production in the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Ecology of tern flight in relation to wind, topography and aerodynamic theory.

Authors:  Anders Hedenström; Susanne Åkesson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Simultaneous measurements of three-dimensional trajectories and wingbeat frequencies of birds in the field.

Authors:  Hangjian Ling; Guillam E Mclvor; Geoff Nagy; Sepehr MohaimenianPour; Richard T Vaughan; Alex Thornton; Nicholas T Ouellette
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.