Literature DB >> 1851649

Prevention of perioperative deep vein thrombosis in general surgery: a multicentre double blind study comparing two doses of Logiparin and standard heparin. H.B.P.M. Research Group.

A Liezorovicz1, H Picolet, J C Peyrieux, J P Boissel.   

Abstract

A total of 1290 patients were enrolled in a randomized multicentre double blind study in order to investigate the use of two doses of a new low molecular weight heparin, Logiparin, in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in general surgery. Patients who were included had no contraindication to heparin therapy and had at least one of the recognized risk factors for DVT. Patients were randomized to receive unfractionated heparin (UH) 5000 units b.d., Logiparin 2500 units daily or Logiparin 3500 units daily. Each treatment was given subcutaneously 2 h before surgery and continued for 7-10 days. Daily 125I-labelled fibrinogen uptake tests (FUTs) were performed from day 2 to day 7 to detect DVT, and phleboangiography was used to confirm the diagnosis. The wound was examined on a daily basis to check for haematoma formation, and all patients were followed up for 1 month after operation. All three treatment arms were well matched for age, sex, weight, diagnosis and type of operation performed. The three major inclusion criteria in the trial were malignancy, age over 60 years and a history of varicose veins. Positive FUTs (UH = 4.2 per cent, Logiparin 2500 units daily = 7.9 per cent, Logiparin 3500 units daily = 3.7 per cent) and positive angiograms (UH = 3.0 per cent, Logiparin 2500 units daily = 5.6 per cent, Logiparin 3500 units daily = 2.3 per cent) were significantly more common in the Logiparin 2500 units daily group than in the UH and Logiparin 3500 units daily groups. The rates of major complications (severe haemorrhage, death, pulmonary embolism, reintervention) were similar in the three groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1851649     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800780410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  13 in total

1.  Subcutaneous heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin as thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of the canadian colorectal DVT prophylaxis trial: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Authors:  R S McLeod; W H Geerts; K W Sniderman; C Greenwood; R C Gregoire; B M Taylor; R E Silverman; K G Atkinson; M Burnstein; J C Marshall; C J Burul; D R Anderson; T Ross; S R Wilson; P Barton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  W E Wade; B C Martin; J A Kotzan; W J Spruill; M A Chisoholm; M Perri
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Low-molecular weight vs. unfractionated heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Prachi Nair; Radhika Trivedi; Patrick Hu; Yingting Zhang; Aziz M Merchant
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-09-03

Review 4.  Reviparin: a review of its efficacy in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  K Wellington; K McClellan; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Tinzaparin sodium: a review of its use in the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and in the prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during haemodialysis.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Lesley J Scott; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Low molecular weight heparin in prevention of perioperative thrombosis.

Authors:  A Leizorovicz; M C Haugh; F R Chapuis; M M Samama; J P Boissel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-17

7.  American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients.

Authors:  David R Anderson; Gian Paolo Morgano; Carole Bennett; Francesco Dentali; Charles W Francis; David A Garcia; Susan R Kahn; Maryam Rahman; Anita Rajasekhar; Frederick B Rogers; Maureen A Smythe; Kari A O Tikkinen; Adolph J Yates; Tejan Baldeh; Sara Balduzzi; Jan L Brożek; Itziar Etxeandia- Ikobaltzeta; Herman Johal; Ignacio Neumann; Wojtek Wiercioch; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Holger J Schünemann; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-12-10

Review 8.  Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  G F Pineo; R D Hull
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Tinzaparin sodium: a review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Susan M Cheer; Christopher J Dunn; Rachel Foster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Tinzaparin. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.

Authors:  H A Friedel; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.