Ali I Abdalla1, Albert J Feilzer. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt. ali_abdalla79@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effect of direct and indirect water storage on the microtensile dentin bond strength of one total-etch and two self-etching adhesives. METHODS: The adhesive materials were: one total-etch adhesive; 'Admira Bond' and two self-etch adhesives; 'Clearfil SE Bond' and 'Hybrid Bond'. Freshly extracted human third molar teeth were used. In each tooth, a Class I cavity (4mmx4mm) was prepared in the occlusal surface with the pulpal floor extending approximately 1mm into dentin. The teeth were divided into three groups (n=18). Each group was restored with the resin composite 'Clearfil APX' using one of the tested adhesives. For each experimental group 3 test procedures (n=6) were carried out: Procedure A: the teeth were stored in water for 24h (control), then sectioned longitudinally, buccolingually and mesiodistally to get rectangular slabs of 1.0-1.2mm thickness on which a microtensile test was carried out. Procedure B: the teeth were also sectioned; however, the slabs were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 4 years before microtensile testing (direct water storage). Procedure C: the teeth were kept in water at 37 degrees C 4 years before sectioning and microtensile testing (Indirect water storage). During microtensile testing the slabs were placed in a universal testing machine and load was applied at cross-head speed of 0.5mm/min. RESULTS: For the 24h control, there was no significant difference in bond strength between the three tested adhesives. After 4 years of indirect water storage, the bond strength decreased but the reduction was not significantly different from those of 24h. After 4 years of direct water storage, the bond strengths of all tested adhesives were significantly reduced compared to their 24h results. CONCLUSION: All the tested adhesives showed no reduction in bond strength after indirect water exposure for 4 years. After 4-year direct water exposure, the bond produced by all tested adhesives was unable to resist deterioration.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effect of direct and indirect water storage on the microtensile dentin bond strength of one total-etch and two self-etching adhesives. METHODS: The adhesive materials were: one total-etch adhesive; 'Admira Bond' and two self-etch adhesives; 'Clearfil SE Bond' and 'Hybrid Bond'. Freshly extracted human third molar teeth were used. In each tooth, a Class I cavity (4mmx4mm) was prepared in the occlusal surface with the pulpal floor extending approximately 1mm into dentin. The teeth were divided into three groups (n=18). Each group was restored with the resin composite 'Clearfil APX' using one of the tested adhesives. For each experimental group 3 test procedures (n=6) were carried out: Procedure A: the teeth were stored in water for 24h (control), then sectioned longitudinally, buccolingually and mesiodistally to get rectangular slabs of 1.0-1.2mm thickness on which a microtensile test was carried out. Procedure B: the teeth were also sectioned; however, the slabs were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 4 years before microtensile testing (direct water storage). Procedure C: the teeth were kept in water at 37 degrees C 4 years before sectioning and microtensile testing (Indirect water storage). During microtensile testing the slabs were placed in a universal testing machine and load was applied at cross-head speed of 0.5mm/min. RESULTS: For the 24h control, there was no significant difference in bond strength between the three tested adhesives. After 4 years of indirect water storage, the bond strength decreased but the reduction was not significantly different from those of 24h. After 4 years of direct water storage, the bond strengths of all tested adhesives were significantly reduced compared to their 24h results. CONCLUSION: All the tested adhesives showed no reduction in bond strength after indirect water exposure for 4 years. After 4-year direct water exposure, the bond produced by all tested adhesives was unable to resist deterioration.
Authors: Marleen Peumans; Jan De Munck; Kirsten L Van Landuyt; Andre Poitevin; Paul Lambrechts; Bart Van Meerbeek Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Leo Tjäderhane; Fabio D Nascimento; Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Ivarne L S Tersariol; Saulo Geraldeli; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay; Marcela Carrilho; Ricardo M Carvalho; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay; Kelli A Agee; Tomohiro Hoshika; Toshikazu Uchiyama; Leo Tjäderhane; Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Jeremy M Thompson; Courtney E McCracken; Stephen W Looney; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Bruno Baracco; M Victoria Fuentes; Miguel A Garrido; Santiago González-López; Laura Ceballos Journal: Odontology Date: 2012-07-13 Impact factor: 2.634
Authors: Sandrina Henn; Fernanda Nedel; Rodrigo Varella de Carvalho; Rafael Guerra Lund; Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci; Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Flávio Fernando Demarco; Evandro Piva Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay; Lorenzo Breschi; Leo Tjäderhane; Ricardo M Carvalho; Marcela Carrilho; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2010-11-27 Impact factor: 5.304