Literature DB >> 18514901

The advantage in being magnocellular: a few more remarks on attention and the magnocellular system.

R Laycock1, D P Crewther, S G Crewther.   

Abstract

We have recently proposed a model of visual processing in which object recognition through the ventral stream into inferotemporal cortex is facilitated by an initial rapid feedforward sweep through the dorsal stream activating parietal and frontal regions prior to subsequent feedback to primary visual cortex (V1). Modulation of inferotemporal cortex also requires feedback from frontal regions, and horizontal connections from the dorsal stream. Aspects of this model, however, have been called into question-in particular the timing advantage of magnocellular over parvocellular arrivals in V1 (the 'magnocellular advantage'), the link between attention and the magnocellular system, and also the role of MT in smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements. These criticisms are each rebutted in detail here, and the basis for a model derived from the magnocellular advantage is reaffirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514901     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  16 in total

Review 1.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Temporal structure of human magnetic evoked fields.

Authors:  David P Crewther; Alyse Brown; Laila Hugrass
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Out of sight but not out of mind: unseen affective faces influence evaluations and social impressions.

Authors:  Eric Anderson; Erika Siegel; Dominique White; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-04-16

4.  Ultrafast scene detection and recognition with limited visual information.

Authors:  Carl Erick Hagmann; Mary C Potter
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-07-08

5.  Glutamate and choline levels predict individual differences in reading ability in emergent readers.

Authors:  Kenneth R Pugh; Stephen J Frost; Douglas L Rothman; Fumiko Hoeft; Stephanie N Del Tufo; Graeme F Mason; Peter J Molfese; W Einar Mencl; Elena L Grigorenko; Nicole Landi; Jonathan L Preston; Leslie Jacobsen; Mark S Seidenberg; Robert K Fulbright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  TMS disruption of V5/MT+ indicates a role for the dorsal stream in word recognition.

Authors:  Robin Laycock; David P Crewther; Paul B Fitzgerald; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Abnormal brain activation in neurofibromatosis type 1: a link between visual processing and the default mode network.

Authors:  Inês R Violante; Maria J Ribeiro; Gil Cunha; Inês Bernardino; João V Duarte; Fabiana Ramos; Jorge Saraiva; Eduardo Silva; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Individual differences in distraction by motion predicted by neural activity in MT/V5.

Authors:  Jennifer R Lechak; Andrew B Leber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Is attention based on spatial contextual memory preferentially guided by low spatial frequency signals?

Authors:  Eva Zita Patai; Alice Buckley; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Responses of primate LGN cells to moving stimuli involve a constant background modulation by feedback from area MT.

Authors:  H E Jones; I M Andolina; K L Grieve; W Wang; T E Salt; J Cudeiro; A M Sillito
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.