BACKGROUND: The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and demographic/clinical characteristics of patients undergoing bariatric surgery is poorly characterized. BMI is often used to characterize patient risk in bariatric surgery. However, its relationship with other risk factors has not been well characterized. METHODS: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-1 was a study of the 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric procedures at 10 clinical centers in the United States. The sample for this study included participants with a BMI > or =40 kg/m(2) and no history of undergoing a bariatric procedure from March 1, 2005 to March 26, 2007. This analysis examined the relationships between BMI strata and several demographic/clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of 2559 patients (23% male, 10% black, 9% age > or =60 yr) with a BMI of > or =40 kg/m(2), 29% had a BMI of 50 to <60 kg/m(2) and 12% a BMI of > or =60 kg/m(2). The percentage of men and blacks increased with greater BMI category and the percentage of older patients (age > or =60 yr) decreased. Patients with a greater BMI were more likely to have a history of several co-morbid conditions (hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, asthma, poor functional status, sleep apnea, pulmonary hypertension, venous thromboembolism, or venous edema with ulcerations) than were patients with a BMI of 40-50 kg/m(2) after adjusting for age, race, sex, and ethnicity. CONCLUSION: A greater BMI was associated with several patient characteristics that have been linked to less weight loss, more adverse outcomes, and increased healthcare use in previous studies. Outcomes analyses should consider the potential for the confounding of BMI with demographic and clinical characteristics.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and demographic/clinical characteristics of patients undergoing bariatric surgery is poorly characterized. BMI is often used to characterize patient risk in bariatric surgery. However, its relationship with other risk factors has not been well characterized. METHODS: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-1 was a study of the 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric procedures at 10 clinical centers in the United States. The sample for this study included participants with a BMI > or =40 kg/m(2) and no history of undergoing a bariatric procedure from March 1, 2005 to March 26, 2007. This analysis examined the relationships between BMI strata and several demographic/clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of 2559 patients (23% male, 10% black, 9% age > or =60 yr) with a BMI of > or =40 kg/m(2), 29% had a BMI of 50 to <60 kg/m(2) and 12% a BMI of > or =60 kg/m(2). The percentage of men and blacks increased with greater BMI category and the percentage of older patients (age > or =60 yr) decreased. Patients with a greater BMI were more likely to have a history of several co-morbid conditions (hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, asthma, poor functional status, sleep apnea, pulmonary hypertension, venous thromboembolism, or venous edema with ulcerations) than were patients with a BMI of 40-50 kg/m(2) after adjusting for age, race, sex, and ethnicity. CONCLUSION: A greater BMI was associated with several patient characteristics that have been linked to less weight loss, more adverse outcomes, and increased healthcare use in previous studies. Outcomes analyses should consider the potential for the confounding of BMI with demographic and clinical characteristics.
Authors: Edward H Livingston; Sergio Huerta; Denice Arthur; Scott Lee; Scott De Shields; David Heber Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jay C Jan; Dennis Hong; Sergio Jose Bardaro; Laura V July; Emma J Patterson Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Steven H Belle; Paul D Berk; Anita P Courcoulas; David R Flum; Carolyn W Miles; James E Mitchell; Walter J Pories; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Garth H Ballantyne; Jonathan Svahn; Rafael F Capella; Joseph F Capella; Hans J Schmidt; Annette Wasielewski; Richard J Davies Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Adolfo Z Fernandez; Eric J Demaria; David S Tichansky; John M Kellum; Luke G Wolfe; Jill Meador; Harvey J Sugerman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: David B Sarwer; Jacqueline C Spitzer; Thomas A Wadden; Raymond C Rosen; James E Mitchell; Kathy Lancaster; Anita Courcoulas; William Gourash; Nicholas J Christian Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Kyle E Freese; Andrew D Althouse; Ramesh Ramanathan; Robert P Edwards; Dana H Bovbjerg; Faina Linkov Journal: Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 0.607
Authors: Akram Khan; Wendy C King; Emma J Patterson; Jamie Laut; William Raum; Anita P Courcoulas; Charles Atwood; Bruce M Wolfe Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Rachel H Mackey; Steven H Belle; Anita P Courcoulas; Greg F Dakin; Clifford W Deveney; David R Flum; Luis Garcia; Wendy C King; Lewis H Kuller; James E Mitchell; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Bruce M Wolfe Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Alexis Gorden; Rongze Yang; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong; Kathleen A Ryan; Elizabeth Speliotes; Ingrid B Borecki; Tamara B Harris; Xin Chu; G Craig Wood; Christopher D Still; Alan R Shuldiner; Glenn S Gerhard Journal: Hum Hered Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 0.444