Literature DB >> 18514474

Treatment entry barriers among California's Proposition 36 offenders.

Elizabeth Evans1, Libo Li, Yih-Ing Hser.   

Abstract

To explore why some Proposition 36 offenders do not enter drug treatment, we analyzed self-reported and administrative data to compare the characteristics, perceptions, and rearrest rates of 124 untreated and 1,335 treated offenders assessed by 30 sites in five California counties. Offenders were comparable in many domains at assessment; however, untreated offenders were younger, not employed, more criminally severe, and less motivated for treatment. To avoid incarceration was the primary reason for choosing Proposition 36, but there were fewer untreated offenders who felt ready for treatment (12.9% vs. 35.7%) and there were more who accepted the Proposition 36 program only upon recommendation by others (37.9% vs. 11.7%). Reasons for not entering treatment included rearrest (31.6%), no desire for treatment (23.9%), and assignment to a program that was too far away (11.1%). Both groups had fewer total arrests after assessment, but recidivism was higher among untreated offenders. Understanding untreated Proposition 36 offenders can aid efforts to improve treatment entry rates and related outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514474      PMCID: PMC2576498          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  21 in total

1.  Attrition prevention with individuals awaiting publicly funded drug treatment.

Authors:  D M Donovan; D B Rosengren; L Downey; G B Cox; K L Sloan
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Drug policy by popular referendum: This, too, shall pass.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; Amiram Elwork; David S Festinger; A Thomas McLellan
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2003-10

3.  Gender differences in substance use treatment entry and retention among prisoners with substance use histories.

Authors:  Bernadette Pelissier
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Incorporating a public health approach in drug law: lessons from local expansion of treatment capacity and access under California's Proposition 36.

Authors:  Dorie Klein; Robin E Miller; Amanda Noble; Richard Speiglman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Treatment barriers identified by substance abusers assessed at a centralized intake unit.

Authors:  Richard C Rapp; Jiangmin Xu; Carey A Carr; D Tim Lane; Jichuan Wang; Robert Carlson
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2006-04

6.  Impact of California's Proposition 36 on the drug treatment system: treatment capacity and displacement.

Authors:  Yih-Ing Hser; Cheryl Teruya; Alison H Brown; David Huang; Elizabeth Evans; M Douglas Anglin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Social control and coercion in addiction treatment: towards evidence-based policy and practice.

Authors:  T Cameron Wild
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Predicting drug treatment entry among treatment-seeking individuals.

Authors:  Y I Hser; M Maglione; M L Polinsky; M D Anglin
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  1998 May-Jun

9.  Predictors of drug abuse treatment entry among crack-cocaine smokers.

Authors:  Harvey A Siegal; Russel S Falck; Jichuan Wang; Robert G Carlson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients. The Addiction Severity Index.

Authors:  A T McLellan; L Luborsky; G E Woody; C P O'Brien
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.254

View more
  11 in total

1.  Drug-abusing offenders with comorbid mental disorders: problem severity, treatment participation, and recidivism.

Authors:  Adi Jaffe; Jiang Du; David Huang; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2012-02-02

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Libo Li; Darren Urada; M Douglas Anglin
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2014-09

3.  Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; M Douglas Anglin; Darren Urada; Joy Yang
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2010-09-29

4.  Criminal justice outcomes after engagement in outpatient substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Deborah W Garnick; Constance M Horgan; Andrea Acevedo; Margaret T Lee; Lee Panas; Grant A Ritter; Robert Dunigan; Alfred Bidorini; Kevin Campbell; Karin Haberlin; Alice Huber; Dawn Lambert-Wacey; Tracy Leeper; Mark Reynolds; David Wright
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-10-14

5.  A latent class approach to treatment readiness corresponds to a transtheoretical ("Stages of Change") model.

Authors:  Paul Truman Harrell; R C Trenz; M Scherer; S S Martins; W W Latimer
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-05-22

6.  Offender diversion into substance use disorder treatment: the economic impact of California's proposition 36.

Authors:  M Douglas Anglin; Bohdan Nosyk; Adi Jaffe; Darren Urada; Elizabeth Evans
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Disparities in completion of substance abuse treatment between and within racial and ethnic groups.

Authors:  Erick G Guerrero; Jeanne C Marsh; Lei Duan; Christine Oh; Brian Perron; Benedict Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Libo Li; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2008-12-11

9.  What could the program have done differently? A qualitative examination of reasons for leaving outpatient treatment.

Authors:  Alexandre B Laudet; Virginia Stanick; Brian Sands
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2009-03-31

10.  Do cultural and linguistic competence matter in Latinos' completion of mandated substance abuse treatment?

Authors:  Erick G Guerrero; Michael Campos; Darren Urada; Joy C Yang
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2012-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.