Literature DB >> 15595948

Incorporating a public health approach in drug law: lessons from local expansion of treatment capacity and access under California's Proposition 36.

Dorie Klein1, Robin E Miller, Amanda Noble, Richard Speiglman.   

Abstract

A major state drug abuse initiative, California's Proposition 36 of 2000, mandated that adults convicted of drug possession be offered treatment in lieu of incarceration. While the law expanded public treatment for arrestees, the counties were given discretion in structuring their systems of care and procedures to manage clients. Using data from a study of key informants in eight counties, this article examines local planning to increase drug treatment capacity and manage clients' access to treatment. In both these planning domains, it describes the counties' strategies and concerns, reasons for their differences in approaches, and whether and how this state initiative, which explicitly incorporated treatment objectives into penal drug law, will shift the debate over drug abuse policy toward greater consideration of public health goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15595948      PMCID: PMC2690186          DOI: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00329.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  4 in total

1.  Drug policy by popular referendum: This, too, shall pass.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; Amiram Elwork; David S Festinger; A Thomas McLellan
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2003-10

Review 2.  Mandated AA attendance for recidivist drinking drivers: policy issues.

Authors:  R Speiglman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Mandated AA attendance for recidivist drinking drivers: ideology, organization, and California criminal justice practices.

Authors:  R Speiglman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Treating drug-abusing offenders. Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California's Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Yih-Ing Hser; Cheryl Teruya; Elizabeth A Evans; Douglas Longshore; Christine Grella; David Farabee
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2003-10
  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Differential outcomes of court-supervised substance abuse treatment among California parolees and probationers.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Adi Jaffe; Darren Urada; M Douglas Anglin
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2011-04-24

2.  Outcomes in a Sample of Opiod-Dependent Clients Treated Under California's Proposition 36.

Authors:  Jongserl Chun; Joseph R Guydish; James L Sorensen; Nancy A Haug; Siara Andrews; Larry Nelson
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2007-07-01

3.  Influence of perceived coercion and motivation on treatment completion and re-arrest among substance-abusing offenders.

Authors:  Michael Prendergast; Lisa Greenwell; David Farabee; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Treatment entry barriers among California's Proposition 36 offenders.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Libo Li; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2008-06-02

5.  Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Libo Li; Darren Urada; M Douglas Anglin
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2014-09

6.  Reinforcing Abstinence and Treatment Participation among Offenders in a Drug Diversion Program: Are Vouchers Effective?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hall; Michael L Prendergast; John M Roll; Umme Warda
Journal:  Crim Justice Behav       Date:  2009

7.  Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; M Douglas Anglin; Darren Urada; Joy Yang
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2010-09-29

8.  Impact of court-mandated substance abuse treatment on clinical decision making.

Authors:  Noosha Niv; Alison Hamilton; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 1.505

9.  Employment services utilization and outcomes among substance abusing offenders participating in California's proposition 36 drug treatment initiative.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Yih-Ing Hser; David Huang
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.505

10.  Characteristics of facilities with specialized programming for drinking drivers and for other criminal justice involved clients: analysis of a national database.

Authors:  Cynthia L Arfken; Sheryl Pimlott Kubiak
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2007-08-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.