Literature DB >> 18514002

Rod and cone photoreceptors: molecular basis of the difference in their physiology.

Satoru Kawamura1, Shuji Tachibanaki.   

Abstract

Vertebrate retinal photoreceptors consist of two types of cells, the rods and cones. Rods are highly light-sensitive but their flash response time course is slow, so that they can detect a single photon in the dark but are not good at detecting an object moving quickly. Cones are less light-sensitive and their flash response time course is fast, so that cones mediate daylight vision and are more suitable to detect a moving object than rods. The phototransduction mechanism was virtually known by the mid 80s, and detailed mechanisms of the generation of a light response are now understood in a highly quantitative manner at the molecular level. However, most of these studies were performed in rods, but not in cones. Therefore, the mechanisms of low light-sensitivity or fast flash response time course in cones have not been known. The major reason for this slow progress in the study of cone phototransduction was due to the inability of getting a large quantity of purified cones to study them biochemically. We succeeded in its purification using carp retina, and have shown that each step responsible for generation of a light response is less effective in cones and that the reactions responsible for termination of a light response are faster in cones. Based on these findings, we speculated a possible mechanism of evolution of rods that diverged from cones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514002     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.04.600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol        ISSN: 1095-6433            Impact factor:   2.320


  62 in total

Review 1.  Rod and cone visual pigments and phototransduction through pharmacological, genetic, and physiological approaches.

Authors:  Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Photoreceptor signaling: supporting vision across a wide range of light intensities.

Authors:  Vadim Y Arshavsky; Marie E Burns
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Quantitative aspects of cGMP phosphodiesterase activation in carp rods and cones.

Authors:  Yuki Koshitani; Shuji Tachibanaki; Satoru Kawamura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Retrograde intraciliary trafficking of opsin during the maintenance of cone-shaped photoreceptor outer segments of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Guilian Tian; Kerrie H Lodowski; Richard Lee; Yoshikazu Imanishi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  High cGMP synthetic activity in carp cones.

Authors:  Norihiko Takemoto; Shuji Tachibanaki; Satoru Kawamura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Evolution of opsins and phototransduction.

Authors:  Yoshinori Shichida; Take Matsuyama
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  An alternative isomerohydrolase in the retinal Müller cells of a cone-dominant species.

Authors:  Yusuke Takahashi; Gennadiy Moiseyev; Ying Chen; Olga Nikolaeva; Jian-Xing Ma
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.542

8.  Substrate specificity and subcellular localization of the aldehyde-alcohol redox-coupling reaction in carp cones.

Authors:  Shinya Sato; Takashi Fukagawa; Shuji Tachibanaki; Yumiko Yamano; Akimori Wada; Satoru Kawamura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Energy metabolism of the visual system.

Authors:  Margaret T T Wong-Riley
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2010-07-22

Review 10.  Phototransduction motifs and variations.

Authors:  King-Wai Yau; Roger C Hardie
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.