Literature DB >> 18513625

Inequity in cancer care: explanations and solutions for disparity.

Michael L Steinberg1.   

Abstract

The inequitable delivery of health care leads to differences in health outcomes for certain groups, particularly minorities and the poor that are described by the public health policy term disparity. Initially understood in racial/ethnic terms, disparity is now known as having its roots in poverty and the lack of social and medical infrastructure to equitably address the needs of affected patient groups. Powerful tools of health services research and the quality discipline have accurately described, and to a great extent explained, the disparity problem. Quality of care and disparity are integrally related concepts that benefit from the coordination of interventions to address the structural and process-based deficits in the health care delivery system that are the root cause of disparity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18513625     DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  9 in total

1.  Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Shim; Kyung-Sook Lee; Jong-Hyock Park; Jae-Hyun Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of brain tumors.

Authors:  William T Curry; Fred G Barker
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Medicaid expansion and access to care among cancer survivors: a baseline overview.

Authors:  Wafa W Tarazi; Cathy J Bradley; David W Harless; Harry D Bear; Lindsay M Sabik
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Socioeconomic inequality and omission of adjuvant radiation therapy in high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Leo Y Luo; Emeline M Aviki; Anna Lee; Marisa A Kollmeier; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; C Jillian Tsai; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Rates and predictors of consideration for adjuvant radiotherapy among high-risk breast cancer patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Stanimira Krotneva; Kristen Reidel; Mohammed Nassif; Nora Trabulsi; Nancy Mayo; Robyn Tamblyn; Ari N Meguerditchian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors to predict treatment response in high risk neuroblastoma patients receiving topotecan and cyclophosphamide containing induction regimen: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Piya Rujkijyanont; Apichat Photia; Chanchai Traivaree; Chalinee Monsereenusorn; Usanarat Anurathapan; Panya Seksarn; Darintr Sosothikul; Piti Techavichit; Kleebsabai Sanpakit; Kamon Phuakpet; Surapon Wiangnon; Thirachit Chotsampancharoen; Su-On Chainansamit; Somjai Kanjanapongkul; Arunotai Meekaewkunchorn; Suradej Hongeng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Healthcare Inequities Experienced by Patients with Cancer: A Qualitative Study in Medellín, Colombia.

Authors:  Luis Felipe Higuita-Gutiérrez; Diego Alejandro Estrada-Mesa; Jaiberth Antonio Cardona-Arias
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.314

8.  Cost of comprehensive patient assistance program in early breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Anne M Stey; Kezhen Fei; Rebeca Franco; Ali Mendelson; Nina A Bickell
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-04-19

9.  Impact of care disparities in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Tasneem Kaleem; Grace Li Smith; Robert C Miller
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.