Wafa W Tarazi1, Cathy J Bradley2, David W Harless3, Harry D Bear4, Lindsay M Sabik5. 1. Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main St., P.O. Box 980430, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA. taraziw@vcu.edu. 2. University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA. 3. School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 4. School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 5. Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main St., P.O. Box 980430, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act facilitates access to care among vulnerable populations, but 21 states have not yet expanded the program. Medicaid expansions may provide increased access to care for cancer survivors, a growing population with chronic conditions. We compare access to health care services among cancer survivors living in non-expansion states to those living in expansion states, prior to Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. METHODS: We use the 2012 and 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to estimate multiple logistic regression models to compare inability to see a doctor because of cost, having a personal doctor, and receiving an annual checkup in the past year between cancer survivors who lived in non-expansion states and survivors who lived in expansion states. RESULTS: Cancer survivors in non-expansion states had statistically significantly lower odds of having a personal doctor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.76, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.92, p < 0.05) and higher odds of being unable to see a doctor because of cost (AOR 1.14, 95 % CI 0.98-1.31, p < 0.10). Statistically significant differences were not found for annual checkups. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act, cancer survivors living in expansion states had better access to care than survivors living in non-expansion states. Failure to expand Medicaid could potentially leave many cancer survivors with limited access to routine care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Existing disparities in access to care are likely to widen between cancer survivors in Medicaid non-expansion and expansion states.
PURPOSE: Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act facilitates access to care among vulnerable populations, but 21 states have not yet expanded the program. Medicaid expansions may provide increased access to care for cancer survivors, a growing population with chronic conditions. We compare access to health care services among cancer survivors living in non-expansion states to those living in expansion states, prior to Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. METHODS: We use the 2012 and 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to estimate multiple logistic regression models to compare inability to see a doctor because of cost, having a personal doctor, and receiving an annual checkup in the past year between cancer survivors who lived in non-expansion states and survivors who lived in expansion states. RESULTS:Cancer survivors in non-expansion states had statistically significantly lower odds of having a personal doctor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.76, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.92, p < 0.05) and higher odds of being unable to see a doctor because of cost (AOR 1.14, 95 % CI 0.98-1.31, p < 0.10). Statistically significant differences were not found for annual checkups. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act, cancer survivors living in expansion states had better access to care than survivors living in non-expansion states. Failure to expand Medicaid could potentially leave many cancer survivors with limited access to routine care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Existing disparities in access to care are likely to widen between cancer survivors in Medicaid non-expansion and expansion states.
Entities:
Keywords:
Access to care; Cancer survivors; Disparities; Medicaid expansion
Authors: K Robin Yabroff; Pamela F Short; Steven Machlin; Emily Dowling; Heather Rozjabek; Chunyu Li; Timothy McNeel; Donatus U Ekwueme; Katherine S Virgo Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Christopher R Friese; Kathryn A Martinez; Paul Abrahamse; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Reshma Jagsi; Jennifer J Griggs; Sarah T Hawley; Steven J Katz Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kelsey L Corrigan; Leticia Nogueira; K Robin Yabroff; Chun Chieh Lin; Xuesong Han; Junzo P Chino; Anna E Coghill; Meredith Shiels; Ahmedin Jemal; Gita Suneja Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Brynn Fowler; Qian Ding; Lisa Pappas; Yelena P Wu; Lauri Linder; Jeff Yancey; Jennifer Wright; Margaret Clayton; Deanna Kepka; Anne C Kirchhoff Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Heather E Angier; Miguel Marino; Rachel J Springer; Teresa D Schmidt; Nathalie Huguet; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860