Literature DB >> 18513551

Capsule endoscopy and bowel preparation with oral sodium phosphate: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Marie-George Lapalus1, Emmanuel Ben Soussan, Jean-Christophe Saurin, Olivier Favre, Pierre Nicolas D'Halluin, Dimitri Coumaros, Marianne Gaudric, Fabien Fumex, Michel Antonietti, Jean-Louis Gaudin, Philippe Jacob, Denis Heresbach, Charalambos Pilichos, Rong Fan, Marianne Mozer, Laurent Heyries, Jerome Dumortier, Thierry Ponchon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the first procedure to explore the small bowel in obscure GI bleeding (OGB).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of bowel preparation with oral sodium phosphate (NaP) in this indication.
DESIGN: A prospective multicenter, controlled, randomized, blind study.
METHODS: A total of 129 patients with the diagnosis of OGB were included and were randomized into 2 groups (group A [n = 64] and group B [n = 63]). In group A, a CE was performed after an 8-hour fasting period. In group B, patients were asked to drink 2 doses of 45 mL NaP before swallowing the capsule. The quality of the images was assessed at 5 different locations of the small bowel. Bowel cleanliness and visibility were evaluated by using 2 scoring systems, which included assessing the presence of bubbles, liquid, and the rate of visibility.
RESULTS: A total of 127 patients (53 men; mean age 56.9 years, range 19-90 years) were analyzed for the preparation and detection of lesions (2 patients were not able to swallow the capsule). No difference was observed for cleanliness and visibility between the 2 groups at any of the small-bowel segments; no difference was found for gastric transit time (39.8 minutes vs 35.7 minutes, P = .63), small-bowel transit time (257.5 minutes vs 248.6 minutes, P = .59), and the detection of lesions (35.9% vs 42.8%, P = .54). LIMITATIONS: The evaluation of bowel cleanliness was based on subjective features.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study, despite a significant number of limitations, did not support that small-bowel preparation with oral NaP can be recommended for CE exploration in patients with OGB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18513551     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  18 in total

Review 1.  Capsule endoscopy: progress update and challenges ahead.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Arianna Menciassi; Paolo Dario; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Intestinal preparation prior to capsule endoscopy administration.

Authors:  Vicente Pons Beltrán; Cristina Carretero; Begoña Gonzalez-Suárez; Iñaqui Fernandez-Urien; Miguel Muñoz-Navas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A novel cleansing score system for capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Sung Chul Park; Bora Keum; Jong Jin Hyun; Yeon Seok Seo; Yong Sik Kim; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hoon Jai Chun; Soon Ho Um; Chang Duck Kim; Ho Sang Ryu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Deirdre McNamara; Edward J Despott; Samuel Adler; Brooks D Cash; Ignacio Fernández-Urién; Hrvoje Ivekovic; Martin Keuchel; Mark McAlindon; Jean-Christophe Saurin; Simon Panter; Cristina Bellisario; Silvia Minozzi; Carlo Senore; Cathy Bennett; Michael Bretthauer; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Dirk Domagk; Cesare Hassan; Michal F Kaminski; Colin J Rees; Roland Valori; Raf Bisschops; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 5.  Review of small-bowel cleansing scales in capsule endoscopy: A panoply of choices.

Authors:  Ana Ponte; Rolando Pinho; Adélia Rodrigues; João Carvalho
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-16

6.  Effect of bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol on quality of capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Sung Chul Park; Bora Keum; Yeon Seok Seo; Yong Sik Kim; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hoon Jai Chun; Soon Ho Um; Chang Duck Kim; Ho Sang Ryu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Prospective controlled study on the effects of polyethylene glycol in capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Takafumi Ito; Ken Ohata; Akiko Ono; Hideyuki Chiba; Yosuke Tsuji; Hajime Sato; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A novel purgative protocol for capsule endoscopy of the small bowel produces better quality of visibility than 2 l of PEG: Timing is of the essence.

Authors:  Samuel N Adler; Shai Farkash; Yishai Sompolinsky; Inna Gafanovich; Eran Goldin; Ariella Bar-Gil Shitrit
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Evaluation of different bowel preparations for small bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Vicente Pons Beltrán; Begoña González Suárez; Cecilia González Asanza; Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado; Servando Fernández Diez; Iñaqui Fernández-Urién; Alfredo Mata Bilbao; Jorge Carlos Espinós Pérez; Maria Jose Pérez Grueso; Lidia Argüello Viudez; Julio Valle Muñoz; Fernando Carballo Alvarez; Miguel Muñoz-Navas; Jose Llach Vila; Juan Andrés Ramírez Armengol; Joaquin Balanzó Tintoré; Teresa Sala Felis; Pedro Menchen Fernández-Pacheco
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Inpatient capsule endoscopy leads to frequent incomplete small bowel examinations.

Authors:  Cemal Yazici; John Losurdo; Michael D Brown; Scott Oosterveen; Robert Rahimi; Ali Keshavarzian; Leila Bozorgnia; Ece Mutlu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.