Literature DB >> 18511049

A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation.

Heitham Abdul-Baki1, Jana G Hashash, Ihab I Elhajj, Cecilio Azar, Lara El Zahabi, Fadi H Mourad, Kassem A Barada, Ala I Sharara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Problems of compliance, quality, and safety of colon preparation regimens have prompted continued investigation with alternative forms of cleansing.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of tegaserod as an adjunct to a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-E), given as a whole dose or split dose, in colonoscopy preparation.
DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.
SETTING: A single university-based hospital. PATIENTS: Patients who were undergoing elective colonoscopy.
INTERVENTIONS: A 4-arm randomization scheme that compared tegaserod with a placebo, each with whole-dose or split-dose PEG-E preparation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy of colon cleansing was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included adherence, tolerability, adverse effects, and patient perceptions of their preparation quality.
RESULTS: A total of 382 patients completed the trial. Patients who received the split-dose preparation had significantly better colon cleansing than those who received the whole-dose preparation (88.9% vs 42.6%, P < .001). The addition of tegaserod did not significantly improve the overall colonoscopy preparation quality compared with a placebo. However, there were fewer poor preparations in the whole-dose PEG-E group (12.4% vs 1.1%, P = .002, Bonferroni correction removes significance) and more excellent preparations in the split-dose group (53.3% vs 38.3%, P = .035, Bonferroni correction removes significance) in favor of tegaserod. Interobserver and intraobserver variability analysis showed substantial agreement among endoscopists. Adherence was significantly lower in the whole-dose group versus the split-dose PEG-E group (68.8% vs 91%, P < .001), independent of the use of tegaserod. Adverse effects were not different between study groups. LIMITATIONS: A 4-arm randomization and the single-center nature of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Tegaserod has a marginal effect on the quality of colonoscopy preparation when used as an adjuvant to PEG-E. The split-dose PEG-E was superior to the whole-dose PEG-E and resulted in better colon cleansing, adherence, and tolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18511049     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.01.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  23 in total

1.  Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ravi Juluri; George Eckert; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Update on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Cristina C Rutherford; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03

3.  Willingness to undergo split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and compliance with split-dose instructions.

Authors:  R Zackary Unger; Sable P Amstutz; Da Hea Seo; Melanie Huffman; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Current status of chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan P Nass; Sean E Connolly
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

5.  Nationwide variability of colonoscopy preparation instructions.

Authors:  Loc Ton; Helen Lee; Pushpak Taunk; Audrey H Calderwood; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Split-dose menthol-enhanced PEG vs PEG-ascorbic acid for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Ala I Sharara; Ali H Harb; Fayez S Sarkis; Jean M Chalhoub; Rami Badreddine; Fadi H Mourad; Mahmoud Othman; Omar Masri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Split dose and MiraLAX-based purgatives to enhance bowel preparation quality becoming common recommendations in the US.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Corey H Basch; Charles E Basch; Fay Kastrinos; Beverly J Insel; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  A feasibility study of probiotics pretreatment as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy in constipated patients.

Authors:  Hyuk Lee; Young-Ho Kim; Jeong Hwan Kim; Dong Kyung Chang; Jin Yong Kim; Hee Jung Son; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jong Chul Rhee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  How to choose the best preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kaitlin E Occhipinti; Jack A Di Palma
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplastic Lesions in Patients with Sporadic Sessile Serrated Adenomas Undergoing Colonoscopic Surveillance.

Authors:  Lisandro Pereyra; Rafael Zamora; Estanislao Jesús Gómez; Carolina Fischer; Guillermo Nicolas Panigadi; Raquel González; Maximiliano Bun; José Manuel Mella; Mariana Omodeo; Pablo Luna; Marcelo Amante; Gabriel Casas; Silvia Pedreira; Daniel Cimmino; Luis Boerr
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.