Literature DB >> 30030396

Surprise About Sensory Event Timing Drives Cortical Transients in the Beta Frequency Band.

Thomas Meindertsma1,2,3, Niels A Kloosterman2,3,4, Andreas K Engel5, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers2, Tobias H Donner5,2,3.   

Abstract

Learning the statistical structure of the environment is crucial for adaptive behavior. Humans and nonhuman decision-makers seem to track such structure through a process of probabilistic inference, which enables predictions about behaviorally relevant events. Deviations from such predictions cause surprise, which in turn helps improve inference. Surprise about the timing of behaviorally relevant sensory events drives phasic responses of neuromodulatory brainstem systems, which project to the cerebral cortex. Here, we developed a computational model-based magnetoencephalography (MEG) approach for mapping the resulting cortical transients across space, time, and frequency, in the human brain (N = 28, 17 female). We used a Bayesian ideal observer model to learn the statistics of the timing of changes in a simple visual detection task. This model yielded quantitative trial-by-trial estimates of temporal surprise. The model-based surprise variable predicted trial-by-trial variations in reaction time more strongly than the externally observable interval timings alone. Trial-by-trial variations in surprise were negatively correlated with the power of cortical population activity measured with MEG. This surprise-related power suppression occurred transiently around the behavioral response, specifically in the beta frequency band. It peaked in parietal and prefrontal cortices, remote from the motor cortical suppression of beta power related to overt report (button press) of change detection. Our results indicate that surprise about sensory event timing transiently suppresses ongoing beta-band oscillations in association cortex. This transient suppression of frontal beta-band oscillations might reflect an active reset triggered by surprise, and is in line with the idea that beta-oscillations help maintain cognitive sets.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The brain continuously tracks the statistical structure of the environment to anticipate behaviorally relevant events. Deviations from such predictions cause surprise, which in turn drives neural activity in subcortical brain regions that project to the cerebral cortex. We used magnetoencephalography in humans to map out surprise-related modulations of cortical population activity across space, time, and frequency. Surprise was elicited by variable timing of visual stimulus changes requiring a behavioral response. Surprise was quantified by means of an ideal observer model. Surprise predicted behavior as well as a transient suppression of beta frequency-band oscillations in frontal cortical regions. Our results are in line with conceptual accounts that have linked neural oscillations in the beta-band to the maintenance of cognitive sets.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/387600-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beta oscillations; computational model; coxtex; temporal surprise

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30030396      PMCID: PMC6705972          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0307-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

Review 1.  Network reset: a simplified overarching theory of locus coeruleus noradrenaline function.

Authors:  Sebastien Bouret; Susan J Sara
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Phasic norepinephrine: a neural interrupt signal for unexpected events.

Authors:  Peter Dayan; Angela J Yu
Journal:  Network       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.273

3.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.

Authors:  Eric Maris; Robert Oostenveld
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges.

Authors:  J Gibbon; C Malapani; C L Dale; C Gallistel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Top-down modulation in human visual cortex predicts the stability of a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  Niels A Kloosterman; Thomas Meindertsma; Arjan Hillebrand; Bob W van Dijk; Victor A F Lamme; Tobias H Donner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Endogenous modulation of low frequency oscillations by temporal expectations.

Authors:  Andre M Cravo; Gustavo Rohenkohl; Valentin Wyart; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Katherine M Rumsey; Robert C Wilson; Kinjan Parikh; Benjamin Heasly; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  The Sense of Confidence during Probabilistic Learning: A Normative Account.

Authors:  Florent Meyniel; Daniel Schlunegger; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Normative evidence accumulation in unpredictable environments.

Authors:  Christopher M Glaze; Joseph W Kable; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Influence of uncertainty and surprise on human corticospinal excitability during preparation for action.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Lee M Harrison; Felix Blankenburg; Rogier B Mars; Patrick Haggard; Karl J Friston; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  1 in total

1.  Implicitly learning when to be ready: From instances to categories.

Authors:  Wouter Kruijne; Riccardo M Galli; Sander A Los
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.