Literature DB >> 18507742

Sexual antagonism and the evolution of X chromosome inactivation.

Jan Engelstädter1, David Haig.   

Abstract

In most female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated early in embryogenesis. Expression of most genes on this chromosome is shut down, and the inactive state is maintained throughout life in all somatic cells. It is generally believed that X-inactivation evolved as a means of achieving equal gene expression in males and females (dosage compensation). Following degeneration of genes on the Y chromosome, gene expression on X chromosomes in males and females is upregulated. This results in closer to optimal gene expression in males, but deleterious overexpression in females. In response, selection is proposed to favor inactivation of one of the X chromosomes in females, restoring optimal gene expression. Here, we make a first attempt at shedding light on this intricate process from a population genetic perspective, elucidating the sexually antagonistic selective forces involved. We derive conditions for the process to work and analyze evolutionary stability of the system. The implications of our results are discussed in the light of empirical findings and a recently proposed alternative hypothesis for the evolution of X-inactivation.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18507742     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00431.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

Review 1.  The sex-specific region of sex chromosomes in animals and plants.

Authors:  Andrea R Gschwend; Laura A Weingartner; Richard C Moore; Ray Ming
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  The evolution of X chromosome inactivation in mammals: the demise of Ohno's hypothesis?

Authors:  Eugénie Pessia; Jan Engelstädter; Gabriel A B Marais
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  A surrogate approach to study the evolution of noncoding DNA elements that organize eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Danielle Vermaak; Joshua J Bayes; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  Muller's ratchet and the degeneration of Y chromosomes: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jan Engelstädter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Mammalian X chromosome inactivation evolved as a dosage-compensation mechanism for dosage-sensitive genes on the X chromosome.

Authors:  Eugénie Pessia; Takashi Makino; Marc Bailly-Bechet; Aoife McLysaght; Gabriel A B Marais
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Dosage compensation evolution in plants: theories, controversies and mechanisms.

Authors:  Aline Muyle; Gabriel A B Marais; Václav Bačovský; Roman Hobza; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  The W, X, Y and Z of sex-chromosome dosage compensation.

Authors:  Judith E Mank
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 8.  Progress and prospects toward our understanding of the evolution of dosage compensation.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Getting a full dose? Reconsidering sex chromosome dosage compensation in the silkworm, Bombyx mori.

Authors:  James R Walters; Thomas J Hardcastle
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.