Literature DB >> 18506009

Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up.

Peter Collins1, Carolyn M Webb, Chee F Chong, Neil E Moat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Graft patency is a fundamental predictor of long-term survival after coronary artery bypass surgery. Left and right internal thoracic artery (arterial) graft patency has been shown to be superior to that of saphenous vein grafts. More recently, the radial artery has been used as an aortocoronary graft, but little is known about the midterm and long-term patency of this conduit. We performed a single-center prospective randomized trial comparing the angiographic patency of radial artery and saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass grafts at 5 years after surgery. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We enrolled 142 patients randomized at a single center to have either the radial artery or saphenous vein grafted to a stenosed branch of the native left circumflex coronary artery. The primary end point was angiographic graft patency 5 years postoperatively. At 5 years, 134 patients were alive and eligible for reangiography (5-year survival, 94.4%). Angiography was performed in 103 patients (77%); 98.3% of radial artery grafts and 86.4% of saphenous vein grafts were patent (P=0.04). Graft narrowing occurred in 10% of patent radial artery grafts and 23% of patent saphenous vein grafts (P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Radial artery aortocoronary bypass grafts to a stenosed branch of the circumflex coronary artery have an excellent patency rate at 5 years. This was significantly better than the patency rate for saphenous vein grafts and comparable to reported patency rates for internal thoracic artery grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18506009     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.736215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  44 in total

1.  Evaluation of Previously Cannulated Radial Arteries as Patent Coronary Artery Bypass Conduits.

Authors:  Timothy Watson; Adele Pope; Niels van Pelt; Peter N Ruygrok
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-10-01

2.  Long term outcomes of radial artery grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  James Tatoulis; Thomas A Schwann
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09

3.  Current status of arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  David P Taggart
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

4.  The history of arterial revascularization: from Kolesov to Tector and beyond.

Authors:  Brian F Buxton; Sean D Galvin
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 5.  Radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: does proximal anastomosis to the aorta or left internal mammary artery achieve better patency?

Authors:  Robert A Watson; Mustafa Hamza; Teresa M Tsakok; Maria T Tsakok
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-23

Review 6.  Radial artery graft vs. saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass surgery : which conduit offers better efficacy?

Authors:  H Zhang; Z W Wang; H B Wu; X P Hu; Z Zhou; P Xu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  Saphenous vein graft vs. radial artery graft searching for the best second coronary artery bypass graft.

Authors:  Hilal Ali Al-Sabti; Adil Al Kindi; Khalid Al-Rasadi; Yajnavalka Banerjee; Khamis Al-Hashmi; Ali Al-Hinai
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10

8.  Spontaneous coronary artery dissection.

Authors:  Kareem Salhiyyah; Haitham Abunasra; Salman Waqar; Nigel Wheeldon; Pradip Sarkar
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-10-16

9.  Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries.

Authors:  Xiang Hu; Qiang Zhao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Reappraisal of a 20-year experience with the radial artery as a conduit for coronary bypass grafting.

Authors:  Paul Achouh; Khaled Ould Isselmou; Redha Boutekadjirt; Cosimo D'Alessandro; Jean-Yves Pagny; Regis Fouquet; Jean-Noël Fabiani; Christophe Acar
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.