Literature DB >> 24198449

Saphenous vein graft vs. radial artery graft searching for the best second coronary artery bypass graft.

Hilal Ali Al-Sabti1, Adil Al Kindi, Khalid Al-Rasadi, Yajnavalka Banerjee, Khamis Al-Hashmi, Ali Al-Hinai.   

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was first used in the late 1960s. This revolutionary procedure created hope among ischemic heart disease patients. Multiple conduits are used and the golden standard is the left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery. Although all approaches were advocated by doctors, the use of saphenous vein grafts became the leading approach used by the majority of cardiac surgeons in the 1970s. The radial artery graft was introduced at the same time but was not as prevalent due to complications. It was reintroduced into clinical practice in 1989. The procedure was not well received initially but it has since shown superiority in patency as well as long-term survival after CABG. This review provides a summary of characteristics, technical features and patency rates of the radial artery graft in comparison with venous conduits. Current studies and research into radial artery grafts and saphenous vein grafts for CABG are explored. However, more studies are required to verify the various findings of the positive effects of coronary artery bypass grafting with the help of radial arteries on mortality and long-lasting patency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial grafts; Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); RA graft long-term outcome; Radial artery graft patency; Radial artery graft spasm; Saphenous vein vs. radial artery

Year:  2013        PMID: 24198449      PMCID: PMC3818632          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2013.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc        ISSN: 1016-7315


  30 in total

1.  The technical aspects of radial artery harvesting.

Authors:  L D Conklin; E R Ferguson; M J Reardon
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Remodeling of arterial conduits in coronary grafting.

Authors:  Hendrick B Barner
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Radial artery conduits improve long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Robert F Tranbaugh; Kamellia R Dimitrova; Patricia Friedmann; Charles M Geller; Loren J Harris; Paul Stelzer; Bertram Cohen; Darryl M Hoffman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Does the radial artery provide better long-term patency than the saphenous vein?

Authors:  Georgios P Georghiou; Bernardo A Vidne; Joel Dunning
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-04-18

5.  A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts.

Authors:  Nimesh D Desai; Eric A Cohen; C David Naylor; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Hand circulation after radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Susumu Manabe; Noriyuki Tabuchi; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Hirokuni Arai; Makoto Sunamori
Journal:  J Med Dent Sci       Date:  2005-06

7.  Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Steven Goldman; Gulshan K Sethi; William Holman; Hoang Thai; Edward McFalls; Herbert B Ward; Rosemary F Kelly; Birger Rhenman; Gareth H Tobler; Faisal G Bakaeen; Joseph Huh; Ernesto Soltero; Mohammed Moursi; Miguel Haime; Michael Crittenden; Vigneshwar Kasirajan; Michelle Ratliff; Stewart Pett; Anand Irimpen; William Gunnar; Donald Thomas; Stephen Fremes; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Lynn Harrison; Todd H Wagner; Yajie Wang; Lori Planting; Meredith Miller; Yvette Rodriguez; Elizabeth Juneman; Douglass Morrison; Mary Kaye Pierce; Sandra Kreamer; Mei-Chiung Shih; Kelvin Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries.

Authors:  D P Taggart; R D'Amico; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Costs and quality of life associated with radial artery and saphenous vein cardiac bypass surgery: results from a Veterans Affairs multisite trial.

Authors:  Todd H Wagner; Gulshan Sethi; William Holman; Kelvin Lee; Faisal G Bakaeen; Anjali Upadhyay; Edward McFalls; H Gareth Tobler; Rosemary F Kelly; Michael D Crittenden; Hoang Thai; Steven Goldman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Do women currently receive the same standard of care in coronary artery bypass graft procedures as men? A propensity analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Parolari; Luca Dainese; Moreno Naliato; GianLuca Polvani; Claudia Loardi; Matteo Trezzi; Melissa Fusari; Cristina Beverini; Elena Tremoli; Paolo Biglioli; Francesco Alamanni
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  12 in total

1.  Radial artery: A valuable arterial conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting with precise indications, contraindications and surgical strategy.

Authors:  Giovanni Saeed; Jörg Neuzner; Rainer Gradaus
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-01-11

2.  A mechanical argument for the differential performance of coronary artery grafts.

Authors:  David A Prim; Boran Zhou; Adam Hartstone-Rose; Mark J Uline; Tarek Shazly; John F Eberth
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-09-21

3.  In focus in HCB.

Authors:  Douglas J Taatjes; Jürgen Roth
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.304

4.  Adenosine and lidocaine (AL) combination dilates intimally damaged rat thoracic aortic rings and guinea pig mesenteric arteries: possible significance to cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Aryadi Arsyad; Elke Sokoya; Geoffrey P Dobson
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Deficiency of the TLR4 analogue RP105 aggravates vein graft disease by inducing a pro-inflammatory response.

Authors:  Anouk Wezel; Margreet R de Vries; Johanna M Maassen; Peter Kip; Erna A Peters; Jacco C Karper; Johan Kuiper; Ilze Bot; Paul H A Quax
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Preoperative factors predicting saphenous vein graft occlusion in coronary artery bypass grafting: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Malinska; Zuzanna Podemska; Bartlomiej Perek; Marek Jemielity; Piotr Buczkowski; Malgorzata Grzymislawska; Patrycja Sujka-Kordowska; Michal Nowicki
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 7.  A comparative review of the outcomes of using arterial versus venous conduits in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

Authors:  Mansour Jannati; Mohammad Rafati Navaei; Leila Ghaedian Ronizi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  Graft patency after open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karishma Kodia; Sinal Patel; Matthew P Weber; Jessica G Y Luc; Jae Hwan Choi; Elizabeth J Maynes; Syed-Saif Abbas Rizvi; Dylan P Horan; H Todd Massey; John W Entwistle; Rohinton J Morris; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09

9.  Fibronectin Adsorption on Electrospun Synthetic Vascular Grafts Attracts Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Promotes Endothelialization in Dynamic In Vitro Culture.

Authors:  Ruben Daum; Dmitri Visser; Constanze Wild; Larysa Kutuzova; Maria Schneider; Günter Lorenz; Martin Weiss; Svenja Hinderer; Ulrich A Stock; Martina Seifert; Katja Schenke-Layland
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Differences in Expression of Genes Involved in Bone Development and Morphogenesis in the Walls of Internal Thoracic Artery and Saphenous Vein Conduits May Provide Markers Useful for Evaluation Graft Patency.

Authors:  Mariusz J Nawrocki; Bartłomiej Perek; Patrycja Sujka-Kordowska; Aneta Konwerska; Sandra Kałużna; Piotr Zawierucha; Małgorzata Bruska; Maciej Zabel; Marek Jemielity; Michał Nowicki; Bartosz Kempisty; Agnieszka Malińska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.