BACKGROUND: The tumor suppressors p14(ARF) (ARF) and p16(INK4A) (p16) are encoded by overlapping reading frames at the CDKN2A/INK4A locus on chromosome 9p21. In human melanoma, the accumulated evidence has suggested that the predominant tumor suppressor at 9p21 is p16, not ARF. However, recent observations from melanoma-prone families and murine melanoma models suggest a p16-independent tumor suppressor role for ARF. We analyzed a group of melanoma metastases and cell lines to investigate directly whether somatic alterations to the ARF gene support its role as a p16-independent tumor suppressor in human melanoma, assuming that two alterations (genetic and/or epigenetic) would be required to inactivate a gene. METHODS: We examined the p16/ARF locus in 60 melanoma metastases from 58 patients and in 9 human melanoma cell lines using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect deletions, methylation-specific PCR to detect promoter methylation, direct sequencing to detect mutations affecting ARF and p16, and, in a subset of 20 tumors, immunohistochemistry to determine the effect of these alterations on p16 protein expression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We observed two or more alterations to the ARF gene in 26/60 (43%) metastases. The p16 gene sustained two or more alterations in 13/60 (22%) metastases (P = .03). Inactivation of ARF in the presence of wild-type p16 was seen in 18/60 (30%) metastases. CONCLUSION: Genetic and epigenetic analyses of the human 9p21 locus indicate that modifications of ARF occur independently of p16 inactivation in human melanoma and suggest that ARF is more frequently inactivated than p16.
BACKGROUND: The tumor suppressors p14(ARF) (ARF) and p16(INK4A) (p16) are encoded by overlapping reading frames at the CDKN2A/INK4A locus on chromosome 9p21. In humanmelanoma, the accumulated evidence has suggested that the predominant tumor suppressor at 9p21 is p16, not ARF. However, recent observations from melanoma-prone families and murinemelanoma models suggest a p16-independent tumor suppressor role for ARF. We analyzed a group of melanoma metastases and cell lines to investigate directly whether somatic alterations to the ARF gene support its role as a p16-independent tumor suppressor in humanmelanoma, assuming that two alterations (genetic and/or epigenetic) would be required to inactivate a gene. METHODS: We examined the p16/ARF locus in 60 melanoma metastases from 58 patients and in 9 humanmelanoma cell lines using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect deletions, methylation-specific PCR to detect promoter methylation, direct sequencing to detect mutations affecting ARF and p16, and, in a subset of 20 tumors, immunohistochemistry to determine the effect of these alterations on p16 protein expression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We observed two or more alterations to the ARF gene in 26/60 (43%) metastases. The p16 gene sustained two or more alterations in 13/60 (22%) metastases (P = .03). Inactivation of ARF in the presence of wild-type p16 was seen in 18/60 (30%) metastases. CONCLUSION: Genetic and epigenetic analyses of the human 9p21 locus indicate that modifications of ARF occur independently of p16 inactivation in humanmelanoma and suggest that ARF is more frequently inactivated than p16.
Authors: M G FitzGerald; D P Harkin; S Silva-Arrieta; D J MacDonald; L C Lucchina; H Unsal; E O'Neill; J Koh; D M Finkelstein; K J Isselbacher; A J Sober; D A Haber Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1996-08-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sushila H Mistry; Claire Taylor; Juliette A Randerson-Moor; Mark Harland; Faye Turner; Jennifer H Barrett; Linda Whitaker; Robert B Jenkins; Margaret A Knowles; Julia A Newton Bishop; D Timothy Bishop Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: F J Stott; S Bates; M C James; B B McConnell; M Starborg; S Brookes; I Palmero; K Ryan; E Hara; K H Vousden; G Peters Journal: EMBO J Date: 1998-09-01 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: A P Albino; M J Vidal; N S McNutt; C R Shea; V G Prieto; D M Nanus; J M Palmer; N K Hayward Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Anna E Vilgelm; Jeff S Pawlikowski; Yan Liu; Oriana E Hawkins; Tyler A Davis; Jessica Smith; Kevin P Weller; Linda W Horton; Colt M McClain; Gregory D Ayers; David C Turner; David C Essaka; Clinton F Stewart; Jeffrey A Sosman; Mark C Kelley; Jeffrey A Ecsedy; Jeffrey N Johnston; Ann Richmond Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Chi Luo; Jinghao Sheng; Miaofen G Hu; Frank G Haluska; Rutao Cui; Zhengping Xu; Philip N Tsichlis; Guo-Fu Hu; Philip W Hinds Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Xiaohui Tan; Sarah L Anzick; Sikandar G Khan; Takahiro Ueda; Gary Stone; John J Digiovanna; Deborah Tamura; Daniel Wattendorf; David Busch; Carmen C Brewer; Christopher Zalewski; John A Butman; Andrew J Griffith; Paul S Meltzer; Kenneth H Kraemer Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Amy E Rose; Jaya M Satagopan; Carole Oddoux; Qin Zhou; Ruliang Xu; Adam B Olshen; Jessie Z Yu; Atreya Dash; Jerome Jean-Gilles; Victor Reuter; William L Gerald; Peng Lee; Iman Osman Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 5.531