Literature DB >> 18505327

Effects of a moving distractor object on time-to-contact judgments.

Daniel Oberfeld1, Heiko Hecht.   

Abstract

The effects of moving task-irrelevant objects on time-to-contact (TTC) judgments were examined in 5 experiments. Observers viewed a directly approaching target in the presence of a distractor object moving in parallel with the target. In Experiments 1 to 4, observers decided whether the target would have collided with them earlier or later than a standard (absolute identification task). A contrast effect was observed: If the distractor arrived later than the target, it caused a bias toward early responses, relative to the condition without a distractor. The early-arriving distractor had no significant effect. The pattern of results was unaltered when potentially confounding information from individual visual cues was removed. The availability of stereoscopic information reduced the effect. The contrast effect was also observed if target and distractor were abstract geometric objects rather than simulations of real-world vehicles, rendering less likely a simple safety strategy activated by a potentially threatening distractor. Experiment 5 showed that the effect of the late-arriving distractor generalized to a prediction-motion task. The results indicate that task-irrelevant information in the background has to be considered in revision of time-to-contact theory.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18505327     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Visual attention affects temporal estimation in anticipatory motor actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Simon J Bennett; Joe Causer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of time structure on prediction motion in visual and auditory modalities.

Authors:  Kuiyuan Qin; Wenxiang Chen; Jiayu Cui; Xiaoyu Zeng; Ying Li; Yuan Li; Xuqun You
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 4.  The common rate control account of prediction motion.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

5.  Estimating time-to-contact when vision is impaired.

Authors:  Heiko Hecht; Esther Brendel; Marlene Wessels; Christoph Bernhard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Why do forward maskers affect auditory intensity discrimination? Evidence from "molecular psychophysics".

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn; Martha Kuta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Depression does not affect time perception and time-to-contact estimation.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Sven Thönes; Benyne J Palayoor; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.