Literature DB >> 18504140

Screening young adults for prevalent chlamydial infection in community settings.

Cheryl R Stein1, Jay S Kaufman, Carol A Ford, Peter A Leone, Paul J Feldblum, William C Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Community-based testing may identify young adults in the general population with sexually transmitted chlamydial infection. To develop selective screening guidelines appropriate for community settings, the authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health Wave III (April 2, 2001, to May 9, 2002).
METHODS: Separately for women and men, we developed three predictive models by using unconditional multiple logistic regression for survey data. To account for racial/ethnic disparity in prevalence, initial models included identical predictor characteristics plus information on 1) respondent's race/ethnicity; or 2) respondent's most recent partner's race/ethnicity; or 3) no information on race/ethnicity.
RESULTS: Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosis was available for 10,928 (88.6%) of the sexually experienced respondents. A combination of five characteristics for women and six characteristics for men identified approximately 80% of infections when testing </=50% of the population. Information regarding race/ethnicity dramatically affected algorithm performance.
CONCLUSION: The use of race/ethnicity in any screening algorithm is problematic and controversial, but the model without race information missed many diagnoses in the minority groups. Universal screening in high-prevalence regions and selective screening in low-prevalence regions may be one method of reaching the affected populations while avoiding the stigma of guidelines incorporating race/ethnicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18504140      PMCID: PMC2490822          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  34 in total

1.  Screening for chlamydial infection: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Risk behaviors by audio computer-assisted self-interviews among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative injection drug users.

Authors:  Grace E Macalino; David D Celentano; Carl Latkin; Steffanie A Strathdee; David Vlahov
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2002-10

3.  Gender Differences in HIV Risk Behaviors among Young Adults and Adolescents Entering a Massachusetts Detoxification Center.

Authors:  David Pugatch; Mohun Ramratnam; Larkin Strong; Alexander Feller; Barrett Levesque; Brian P. Dickinson
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.716

4.  Selective testing criteria for gonorrhea among young women screened for Chlamydial infection: contribution of race and geographic prevalence.

Authors:  Lisa E Manhart; Jeanne M Marrazzo; David N Fine; Roxanne P Kerani; Matthew R Golden
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened.

Authors:  Nicola Mills; Gavin Daker-White; Anna Graham; Rona Campbell
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Expanding efforts to prevent chlamydial infection.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology.

Authors:  C F Turner; L Ku; S M Rogers; L D Lindberg; J H Pleck; F L Sonenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team.

Authors:  D S Metzger; B Koblin; C Turner; H Navaline; F Valenti; S Holte; M Gross; A Sheon; H Miller; P Cooley; G R Seage
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Patients attending STD clinics in an evolving health care environment. Demographics, insurance coverage, preferences for STD services, and STD morbidity.

Authors:  C L Celum; G Bolan; M Krone; K Code; P Leone; C Spaulding; K Henry; P Clarke; M Smith; E W Hook
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States.

Authors:  William C Miller; Carol A Ford; Martina Morris; Mark S Handcock; John L Schmitz; Marcia M Hobbs; Myron S Cohen; Kathleen Mullan Harris; J Richard Udry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Higher yet suboptimal chlamydia testing rates at community health centers and outpatient clinics compared with physician offices.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Eugene; Karen W Hoover; Guoyu Tao; Charlotte K Kent
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Inequities in Chlamydia trachomatis Screening Between Black and White Adolescents in a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network, 2015-2019.

Authors:  Sarah Wood; Jungwon Min; Vicky Tam; Julia Pickel; Danielle Petsis; Kenisha Campbell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Performance of risk-based criteria for targeting acute HIV screening in San Francisco.

Authors:  Shelley N Facente; Christopher D Pilcher; Wendy E Hartogensis; Jeffrey D Klausner; Susan S Philip; Brian Louie; Katerina A Christopoulos; Teri Dowling; Grant N Colfax
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Prevalence of chlamydia in young adulthood and association with life course socioeconomic position: birth cohort study.

Authors:  Joanna Crichton; Matthew Hickman; Rona Campbell; Jon Heron; Paddy Horner; John Macleod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Socioeconomic factors and other sources of variation in the prevalence of genital chlamydia infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joanna Crichton; Matthew Hickman; Rona Campbell; Harriet Batista-Ferrer; John Macleod
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Chlamydia prevalence in the general population: is there a sex difference? a systematic review.

Authors:  Patrick W Dielissen; Doreth A M Teunissen; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.