OBJECTIVES: To characterize client demographics, sexually transmitted diseases (STD) morbidity, insurance status, reasons for attending public STD clinics, and future preferences for source of STD services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 2,490 clients attending five urban STD clinics for new problems with interviewer-administered 23-item questionnaire and chart review to obtain clinical and laboratory STD diagnoses. RESULTS: Participants were young (51% < 25 years of age), minority (64% nonwhite), poor (43% < or = $10,000/year), and largely uninsured (59% uninsured, 27% private insurance, and 14% Medicaid). Half had previously visited the STD clinic, and 81% had used other providers for non-STD services in the prior 3 years. STD symptoms were cited as the reason for the visit by 63%. The most common factors associated with seeking care at these STD clinics were walk-in services, costs, and confidentiality concerns. STD morbidity was high; 66% of clients were diagnosed with one or more STD. Most (68%) clients preferred to be treated at the STD clinic in the future if they could go anywhere for STD services. CONCLUSIONS: STD clinics see young, minority, poor, and uninsured clients with high STD rates. Even with unlimited future choice, two thirds of the clients surveyed would still prefer to be treated at STD clinics. This study indicates the continuing need for publicly funded, categorical STD clinics in urban areas with high STD morbidity and the importance of easily accessible, confidential, expert STD services from the private sector and managed care organizations.
OBJECTIVES: To characterize client demographics, sexually transmitted diseases (STD) morbidity, insurance status, reasons for attending public STD clinics, and future preferences for source of STD services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 2,490 clients attending five urban STD clinics for new problems with interviewer-administered 23-item questionnaire and chart review to obtain clinical and laboratory STD diagnoses. RESULTS:Participants were young (51% < 25 years of age), minority (64% nonwhite), poor (43% < or = $10,000/year), and largely uninsured (59% uninsured, 27% private insurance, and 14% Medicaid). Half had previously visited the STD clinic, and 81% had used other providers for non-STD services in the prior 3 years. STD symptoms were cited as the reason for the visit by 63%. The most common factors associated with seeking care at these STD clinics were walk-in services, costs, and confidentiality concerns. STD morbidity was high; 66% of clients were diagnosed with one or more STD. Most (68%) clients preferred to be treated at the STD clinic in the future if they could go anywhere for STD services. CONCLUSIONS: STD clinics see young, minority, poor, and uninsured clients with high STD rates. Even with unlimited future choice, two thirds of the clients surveyed would still prefer to be treated at STD clinics. This study indicates the continuing need for publicly funded, categorical STD clinics in urban areas with high STD morbidity and the importance of easily accessible, confidential, expert STD services from the private sector and managed care organizations.
Authors: Nina T Harawa; Trista A Bingham; Susan D Cochran; Sander Greenland; William E Cunningham Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Laura M Mann; Eloisa Llata; Elaine W Flagg; Jaeyoung Hong; Lenore Asbel; Juli Carlos-Henderson; Roxanne P Kerani; Robert Kohn; Preeti Pathela; Christina Schumacher; Elizabeth A Torrone Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jami S Leichliter; Kate Heyer; Thomas A Peterman; Melissa A Habel; Kathryn A Brookmeyer; Stephanie S Arnold Pang; Mark R Stenger; Gretchen Weiss; Thomas L Gift Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Nicky J Mehtani; Christina M Schumacher; Luke E Johnsen; Joneigh S Khaldun; C Patrick Chaulk; Khalil G Ghanem; Jacky M Jennings; Kathleen R Page Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lorraine T Dean; Madeline C Montgomery; Julia Raifman; Amy Nunn; Thomas Bertrand; Alexi Almonte; Philip A Chan Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Roxanne Y Barrow; Cady Berkel; Lesley C Brooks; Samuel L Groseclose; David B Johnson; Jo A Valentine Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Qi Zhang; Diane Lauderdale; Shanshan Mou; William I Parish; Edward O Laumann; John Schneider Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.681