Literature DB >> 18503542

Proteomic evolution of a wine yeast during the first hours of fermentation.

Zoel Salvadó1, Rosana Chiva, Sonia Rodríguez-Vargas, Francisca Rández-Gil, Albert Mas, José Manuel Guillamón.   

Abstract

The inoculation of active dry wine yeast (ADWY) is one of the most common practices in winemaking. This inoculation exposes the yeast cells to strong osmotic, acidic and thermal stresses, and adaptation to the new medium is crucial for successful fermentation. We have analysed the changes that occur in the ADWY protein profile in the first hours after inoculation under enological-like conditions at a low temperature. Protein changes mainly included enzymes of the nitrogen and carbon metabolism and proteins related to the cellular stress response. Most of the enzymes of the lower part of the glycolysis showed an increase in their concentration 4 and 24 h after inoculation, indicating an increase in glycolytic flux and in ATP production. However, the shift from respiration to fermentation was not immediate in the inoculation because some mitochondrial proteins involved in oxidative metabolism were induced in the first hours after inoculation. Inoculation in this fresh medium also reduced the cellular concentration of stress proteins produced during industrial production of the ADWY. The only exception was Cys3p, which might be involved in glutathione synthesis as a response to oxidative stress. A better understanding of the yeast stress response to rehydration and inoculation will lead to improvements in the handling efficiency of ADWY in winemaking and presumably to better control of fermentation startup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18503542     DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00389.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res        ISSN: 1567-1356            Impact factor:   2.796


  8 in total

1.  Comparative transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of industrial wine yeast strains.

Authors:  Debra Rossouw; Adri H van den Dool; Dan Jacobson; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Stress modulation as a means to improve yeasts for lignocellulose bioconversion.

Authors:  B A Brandt; T Jansen; H Volschenk; J F Görgens; W H Van Zyl; R Den Haan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Starmerella bombicola influences the metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase level during mixed wine fermentation.

Authors:  Vesna Milanovic; Maurizio Ciani; Lucia Oro; Francesca Comitini
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.328

4.  Global phenotypic and genomic comparison of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains reveals a novel role of the sulfur assimilation pathway in adaptation at low temperature fermentations.

Authors:  Estéfani García-Ríos; María López-Malo; José Manuel Guillamón
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Metabolomic comparison of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the cryotolerant species S. bayanus var. uvarum and S. kudriavzevii during wine fermentation at low temperature.

Authors:  María López-Malo; Amparo Querol; José Manuel Guillamon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genome-wide study of the adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the early stages of wine fermentation.

Authors:  Maite Novo; Ana Mangado; Manuel Quirós; Pilar Morales; Zoel Salvadó; Ramon Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Flor Yeast: New Perspectives Beyond Wine Aging.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Legras; Jaime Moreno-Garcia; Severino Zara; Giacomo Zara; Teresa Garcia-Martinez; Juan C Mauricio; Ilaria Mannazzu; Anna L Coi; Marc Bou Zeidan; Sylvie Dequin; Juan Moreno; Marilena Budroni
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Reciprocal hemizygosity analysis reveals that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CGI121 gene affects lag time duration in synthetic grape must.

Authors:  Runze Li; Rebecca C Deed
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.154

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.