Literature DB >> 18502026

Comparison of complications in three incontinent urinary diversions.

Armin Pycha1, Evi Comploj, Thomas Martini, Emanuela Trenti, Christine Mian, Lukas Lusuardi, Michele Lodde, Michael Mian, Salvatore Palermo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few data are available in comparing different incontinent urinary diversions (ICUD).
OBJECTIVE: To compare early, short-term, and long-term complications in three different forms of ICUD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: 130 high-risk patients undergoing radical cystectomy and ICUD were prospectively enrolled at one institution. The patients were divided into three groups: ileal conduit (IC), colon conduit (CC), and ureteroureterocutaneostomy (UUCS). INTERVENTION: All patients underwent radical cystectomy and one form of ICUD. MEASUREMENTS: The complications observed were prospectively listed and subsequently compared. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson's chi-square test. A p-value < or = 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: 130 patients with a median age of 71.0 yr (range 46-81) underwent radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP): n=95 (73%) or anterior pelvic exenteration (APE) n=35 (27%) with lymphadenectomy. An IC was performed in 55, a CC in 34, and a UUCS in 41 patients, respectively. A high comorbidity, mainly diabetes, arteriosclerosis, pulmonary insufficiency, and borderline renal function (creatinine>1.5mg%) was found in 12.7% of group 1, in 35.2% of group 2, and in 48.9% of group 3. Overall median follow-up was 16 mo (range 5-84). Perioperative mortality occurred in 1.5%. The overall perioperative diversion-unrelated complication rate was 23.6%. IC showed the lowest rate with 18.1%, followed by CC with 26.4%, and UUCS with 32%, respectively. In contrast, major diversion-related complications occurred in 18.1% of IC, in 5.8% of CC, and none in UUCS. The same was true for late surgical reintervention, with 20% for IC, 5.8% for CC, and 2.4% for UUCS.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications are closely related to the method selected. The IC had the highest rate of severe complications as well as surgical reinterventions and late complications in the intestinal tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18502026     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  17 in total

1.  A modified cutaneous ureterostomy provides satisfactory short and midterm outcomes in select cases.

Authors:  Priyank Yadav; Varun Mittal; Pankaj Gaur; Devarshi Srivastava; Sanjoy Kumar Sureka; Anil Mandhani
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-03-06

Review 2.  Use of Bowel in Reconstructive Urology: What a Colorectal Surgeon Should Know.

Authors:  Christopher D Morrison; Stephanie J Kielb
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 3.  [Imperative cystectomy in patients at risk. Ileal conduit or ureterocutaneostomy?].

Authors:  S Degener; A S Brandt; D A Lazica; F-C von Rundstedt; M J Mathers; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  The application of wrapping ureter by a pedicled gastrocolic omentum flap combined with an artificial external scaffold to prevent stoma stenosis in rabbit after ureterocutaneostomy.

Authors:  Shigeng Zhang; Fei Gao; Chong Xue; Nan Zhang; Feng Gao; Shaojiang Li; Jiaming Wen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Sarcopenia predicts 90-day mortality and postoperative complications after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Roman Mayr; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Florian Zeman; Marieke Reiffen; Leopold Siebertz; Christoph Niessen; Armin Pycha; Bas W G van Rhijn; Maximilian Burger; Michael Gierth
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  [Complications and their management after urinary diversion].

Authors:  S Rogenhofer; S C Müller; T Kälble
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Ureterocutaneostomy: for whom and when?

Authors:  Zafer Kozacıoğlu; Tansu Değirmenci; Bülent Günlüsoy; Yasin Ceylan; Süleyman Minareci
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-09

8.  Clinical benefits of tubeless umbilical cutaneous ureterostomy.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Numakura; Norihiko Tsuchiya; Makoto Takahashi; Hiroshi Tsuruta; Susumu Akihama; Mitsuru Saito; Takamitsu Inoue; Shintaro Narita; Mingguo Huang; Shigeru Satoh; Tomonori Habuchi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  [Urinary diversion with continent umbilical stoma: Which techniques are suitable for which patients?].

Authors:  T Kälble
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  [Cystectomy in the elderly patient].

Authors:  G Bartsch; K Gust; S Vallo; C Bartsch; I Tsaur; J Mani; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.