Literature DB >> 18501543

Characterization of the methanogenic Archaea within two-phase biogas reactor systems operated with plant biomass.

Michael Klocke1, Edith Nettmann, Ingo Bergmann, Kerstin Mundt, Khadidja Souidi, Jan Mumme, Bernd Linke.   

Abstract

The two-phase leach-bed system is a biogas reactor system optimized for the utilization of energy crop silages at maximized loading rates under maintenance of an optimal microbial activity. In this study, a characterization of the methanogenic microbial community within this reactor system was conducted for the first time. Accordingly, effluent samples from the anaerobic filter and the silage digesting leach-bed reactors of both a laboratory-scale two-phase biogas reactor system and a scaled-up commercial on-farm pilot plant were investigated. In total, five Archaea-specific 16S rDNA libraries were constructed and analyzed by amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), with subsequent phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences for individual ARDRA patterns. A quantification of major methanogenic Archaea groups was conducted by real-time PCR. A total of 663 clones were analyzed and 45 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) related to methanogenic Archaea were detected. These OTUs were related to the orders Methanosarcinales, Methanomicrobiales and Methanobacteriales, as well as the hitherto uncultured CA-11 and ARC-I groups, and most of them occurred throughout all the compartments of both two-phase biogas reactors. The proportion of acetotrophic to hydrogenotrophic methanogens differed between the laboratory and the pilot scale system. A total of 56% of the clones from the 16S rDNA library derived from the laboratory biogas system were assigned to presumably acetotrophic members of Methanosarcinales. In contrast, these OTUs were less abundant in the 16S rDNA library derived from samples of the pilot plant. Therein, the most dominant OTUs were Methanoculleus-related OTUs, which presumably indicated the predominant presence of hydrogenotrophic methanogens. These findings were confirmed by group-specific quantitative real-time PCR assays. The results indicated that the fraction of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens within a biogas reactor caused certain variations, which may reflect varying substrate utilization during methanogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18501543     DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0723-2020            Impact factor:   4.022


  15 in total

1.  Unexpected stability of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes communities in laboratory biogas reactors fed with different defined substrates.

Authors:  K Kampmann; S Ratering; I Kramer; M Schmidt; W Zerr; S Schnell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  DGGE analysis of buffalo manure eubacteria for hydrogen production: effect of pH, temperature and pretreatments.

Authors:  Petronia Carillo; Claudia Carotenuto; Filomena Di Cristofaro; Ioannis Kafantaris; Carmine Lubritto; Mario Minale; Biagio Morrone; Stefania Papa; Pasqualina Woodrow
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Polyphasic analyses of methanogenic archaeal communities in agricultural biogas plants.

Authors:  E Nettmann; I Bergmann; S Pramschüfer; K Mundt; V Plogsties; C Herrmann; M Klocke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Cryptococcus shivajii sp. nov.: a novel basidiomycetous yeast isolated from biogas reactor.

Authors:  Sreenivas Rao Ravella; Stephen A James; Christopher J Bond; Ian N Roberts; Kathryn Cross; Andy Retter; Phil J Hobbs
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Comparative and joint analysis of two metagenomic datasets from a biogas fermenter obtained by 454-pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Sebastian Jaenicke; Christina Ander; Thomas Bekel; Regina Bisdorf; Marcus Dröge; Karl-Heinz Gartemann; Sebastian Jünemann; Olaf Kaiser; Lutz Krause; Felix Tille; Martha Zakrzewski; Alfred Pühler; Andreas Schlüter; Alexander Goesmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Eubacteria and archaea communities in seven mesophile anaerobic digester plants in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Abendroth; Cristina Vilanova; Thomas Günther; Olaf Luschnig; Manuel Porcar
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 7.  Metaproteomics of complex microbial communities in biogas plants.

Authors:  Robert Heyer; Fabian Kohrs; Udo Reichl; Dirk Benndorf
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Improvement of biogas production by bioaugmentation.

Authors:  K L Kovács; N Ács; E Kovács; R Wirth; G Rákhely; Orsolya Strang; Zsófia Herbel; Z Bagi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  A pyrosequencing-based metagenomic study of methane-producing microbial community in solid-state biogas reactor.

Authors:  An Li; Ya'nan Chu; Xumin Wang; Lufeng Ren; Jun Yu; Xiaoling Liu; Jianbin Yan; Lei Zhang; Shuangxiu Wu; Shizhong Li
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Characterization of microbial community structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of straw and cow manure.

Authors:  Li Sun; Phillip B Pope; Vincent G H Eijsink; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.