Literature DB >> 18501475

Triage pain scores and the desire for and use of analgesics.

Adam J Singer1, Gregory Garra, Jasmine K Chohan, Charles Dalmedo, Henry C Thode.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Inadequate analgesia (oligoanalgesia) is a common phenomenon. In an effort to improve pain recognition and management, pain scores are mandated by The Joint Commission. When patients with pain do not receive analgesics, treatment is considered deficient. However, the mere presence of pain does not imply that all patients desire analgesics. We determine how often patients in pain desire and receive analgesics in the emergency department (ED). We hypothesize that many ED patients in pain do not desire analgesics and that most who want them receive them.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of pain-related visits to an academic ED during the spring of 2007. Standardized collection of demographic and clinical data was performed, and patients rated their pain severity on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale. The main outcome measures were the desire for and administration of analgesics during the ED visit. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with patient desire for and administration of analgesics.
RESULTS: We enrolled 392 patients. Mean (SD) age was 39 years (19), 50% were female patients, 76% were white. Mean (SD) initial pain score was 7.1 (2). Of the 392 patients, 199 (51% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46% to 56%]) desired analgesics and 227 (58% [95% CI 53% to 63%]) received analgesics within 92 (SD 106) minutes. Of patients desiring analgesics, 162 (81% [95% CI 75% to 86%]) received them. Reasons for not wanting analgesics included pain tolerable (47%), analgesic taken at home (11%), and wanting to remain alert (7%). Pain scores were higher in those patients who wanted analgesics than in those patients who did not want analgesics (7.8 [95% CI 7.5 to 8.1] versus 6.4 [95% CI 6.1 to 6.7]; difference 1.4 [95% CI 0.9 to 1.8]). In multivariate analysis, pain scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.3 for every 1-point increase in pain score) and constant pain (OR 2.0) were significant factors that predicted wanting analgesics, whereas pain scores (OR 1.2) and desiring analgesics (OR 7.4) were significant predictors of receiving analgesics.
CONCLUSION: Nearly half of all ED patients in pain do not desire analgesics and most who desire analgesics receive them. Although the average pain score for patients not wanting analgesics was lower, it was often in the moderate to severe range. Patients should be asked whether they have pain and whether they want analgesics regardless of their pain scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18501475     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  14 in total

1.  Observational studies of patients in the emergency department: a comparison of 4 sampling methods.

Authors:  Morgan A Valley; Kennon J Heard; Adit A Ginde; Dennis C Lezotte; Steven R Lowenstein
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Ambulatory diagnosis and treatment of nonmalignant pain in the United States, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Matthew Daubresse; Hsien-Yen Chang; Yuping Yu; Shilpa Viswanathan; Nilay D Shah; Randall S Stafford; Stefan P Kruszewski; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Factors influencing desired and received analgesia in emergency department.

Authors:  Attilio Allione; Remo Melchio; Gianpiero Martini; Luca Dutto; Marco Ricca; Emanuele Bernardi; Fulvio Pomero; Valentino Menardo; Bruno Tartaglino
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  [Analgesia for trauma patients in emergency medicine].

Authors:  D Häske; B W Böttiger; B Bouillon; M Fischer; Gernot Gaier; B Gliwitzky; M Helm; P Hilbert-Carius; B Hossfeld; B Schempf; A Wafaisade; M Bernhard
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Analgesia in Patients with Trauma in Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  David Häske; Bernd W Böttiger; Bertil Bouillon; Matthias Fischer; Gernot Gaier; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Matthias Helm; Peter Hilbert-Carius; Björn Hossfeld; Christoph Meisner; Benjamin Schempf; Arasch Wafaisade; Michael Bernhard
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Interpreting the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: United States Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing, 2006-2010.

Authors:  Bory Kea; Rochelle Fu; Robert A Lowe; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Improvement in physician pain perception with using pain scales.

Authors:  Umut Cakir; Yildiray Cete; Ozlem Yigit; Mehmet Nuri Bozdemir
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Clinical Interpretation of Self-Reported Pain Scores in Children with Acute Pain.

Authors:  Daniel S Tsze; Gerrit Hirschfeld; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Racial differences in opioid prescribing for children in the United States.

Authors:  Cornelius B Groenewald; Jennifer A Rabbitts; Elizabeth E Hansen; Tonya M Palermo
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 10.  Racial differences in opiate administration for pain relief at an academic emergency department.

Authors:  R Myles Dickason; Vijai Chauhan; Astha Mor; Erin Ibler; Sarah Kuehnle; Daren Mahoney; Eric Armbrecht; Preeti Dalawari
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.