Literature DB >> 18500264

Parameters of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens lack prognostic significance.

A David Merrilees1, Peter B Bethwaite, Grant L Russell, Richard G Robinson, Brett Delahunt.   

Abstract

The prognostic significance of perineural invasion by prostate cancer is debated. We have evaluated the association between biochemical failure and measurements of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. Perineural invasion was identified in sections using S-100 protein immunostaining. For nerves showing invasion, the involved nerve closest to the edge of the prostate and to the surgical excision margin, as well as the diameter of these nerves, the largest nerve showing perineural invasion and its proximity to the excision margin, and the percentage of nerves showing perineural invasion up to 1.75 mm from the excision margin was determined and tested against time to prostate-specific antigen failure, along with preoperative prostate-specific antigen levels, highest Gleason primary grade, Gleason score and TNM T category. Perineural invasion was present in 90% of cases, with extraprostatic perineural invasion in 25% of tumors. Diameter of nerves showing perineural invasion ranged from 11 to 680 microm and the shortest distance to the surgical excision margin ranged from 33 to 2.57 mm. Perineural invasion density ranged from 6 to 96%. Gleason scores were six in 58 cases, seven in 43 cases, eight in three cases and nine in one case. Clinical T categories were T1c in 75 cases, T2a in 22 cases, T2b in five cases, T2c in two cases, T3 in one case. During a follow-up period of 11 to 55 months (median 26 months), 27 patients showed prostate-specific antigen failure. On univariate analysis only presence of extraprostatic perineural invasion, among parameters of perineural invasion, showed a weak correlation with outcome, while on multivariate analysis this lost significance and preoperative prostate-specific antigen levels, Gleason score and excision margin status were independently associated with biochemical failure. We conclude that the investigated parameters of perineural invasion do not predict prostate-specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18500264     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  15 in total

1.  Factors determining biochemical recurrence in low-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sıtkı Ün; Hakan Türk; Osman Koca; Rauf Taner Divrik; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

2.  Does perineural invasion in a radical prostatectomy specimen predict biochemical recurrence in men with prostate cancer?

Authors:  Fairleigh Reeves; Christopher M Hovens; Laurence Harewood; Shane Battye; Justin S Peters; Anthony J Costello; Niall M Corcoran
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Perineural invasion as predictor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer following open radical prostatectomy: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Mladen Stankovic; Laura Wolff; Teresa Wieder; Joao Mendes; Bastian Schumacher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Prediction of perineural invasion and its prognostic value in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jun Taik Lee; Seungsoo Lee; Chang Jin Yun; Byung Joo Jeon; Jung Man Kim; Hong Koo Ha; Wan Lee; Moon Kee Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17

5.  Secondary circulating prostate cells predict biochemical failure in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy and without evidence of disease.

Authors:  Nigel P Murray; Eduardo Reyes; Nelson Orellana; Cynthia Fuentealba; Leonardo Bádinez; Ruben Olivares; José Porcell; Ricardo Dueñas
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-03-31

6.  Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Diederik M Somford; Inge M van Oort; Jean-Pierre Cosyns; J Alfred Witjes; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Bertrand Tombal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Prognostic factors for the development of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed F Kotb; Ahmed A Elabbady
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-15

8.  Disease-specific outcomes of radical prostatectomies in Northern Norway; a case for the impact of perineural infiltration and postoperative PSA-doubling time.

Authors:  Sigve Andersen; Elin Richardsen; Yngve Nordby; Nora Ness; Oystein Størkersen; Khalid Al-Shibli; Tom Donnem; Helena Bertilsson; Lill-Tove Busund; Anders Angelsen; Roy M Bremnes
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients.

Authors:  Hakan Turk; Orcun Celik; Sitki Un; Mehmet Yoldas; Cemal Selcuk İsoglu; Mustafa Karabicak; Batuhan Ergani; Gokhan Koc; Ferruh Zorlu; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-11-30

10.  Mandibular Canal Widening and Bell's Palsy: Sequelae of Perineural Invasion in Oral Cancer.

Authors:  Gopinath Thilak Parepady Sundar; Vishwanath Sherigar; Sameep S Shetty; Shree Satya; Sourabh M Gohil
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.