Literature DB >> 18499079

Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance.

William S Helton1, Joel S Warm.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to explore whether sustained attention tasks can be adequately described by a mindlessness perspective or a limited resource perspective. One hundred and seventy six participants (88 women and 88 men) were assigned at random to one of two signal salience conditions: high and low. Performance and self-reported states, Energetic Arousal, Tense Arousal, Task-Related-Thoughts, and Task-Unrelated-Thoughts, were collected. Overall performance efficiency and the rate of the vigilance decrement were influenced by the salience level of the signal being observed. Post-task self-reports of Task-Unrelated-Thoughts were significantly related to overall performance efficiency, but not with the vigilance decrement. Post-task self-reports of Energetic Arousal were significantly related to both overall performance and the vigilance decrement. The results support a resource theory perspective in regards to the vigilance decrement and are in contradiction to the mindlessness theory in regards to the vigilance decrement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18499079     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  45 in total

1.  Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  James Head; Paul N Russell; Martin J Dorahy; Ewald Neumann; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dual-task performance during a climbing traverse.

Authors:  Alexander L Green; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Feature absence-presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-20

5.  A new semantic vigilance task: vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs.

Authors:  Samantha L Epling; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cerebral hemovelocity reveals differential resource allocation strategies for extraverts and introverts during vigilance.

Authors:  Tyler H Shaw; Cynthia Nguyen; Kelly Satterfield; Raul Ramirez; Patrick E McKnight
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Practice does not make perfect in a modified sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Working memory load and the vigilance decrement.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task.

Authors:  William S Helton; James Head; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.