Literature DB >> 18498589

Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies.

L Sennerby1, J Gottlow.   

Abstract

Two previous reviews have evaluated the clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants based on studies published until 2005.(1,2) The aim of the present paper was to review controlled clinical studies on the subject published since 2005 including at least 10 patients in each group followed for at least one year in function. Six comparative studies were found and none of these showed any differences in survival rates or marginal bone loss after one to five years. Most authors used specified inclusion criteria to avoid known risk factors such as soft bone, short implants and bruxism. Data from one randomized study in the edentulous maxilla showed no differences between early and delayed loading in consecutive clinical routine cases including short implants and soft bone. Three additional studies comparing different surfaces or implant designs under immediate loading were reviewed. No differences between implants with a moderately rough or smooth surface topography were observed. The data add to the previous bulk of evidence that various designs of implants can be loaded shortly after their placement in both the mandible and the maxilla. However, one study reported on marginal bone loss around a novel one-piece implant design leading to implant failure which was not seen for control two-piece implants.(3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18498589     DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00045.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Dent J        ISSN: 0045-0421            Impact factor:   2.291


  7 in total

1.  Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface.

Authors:  J Y Cha; M D Pereira; A A Smith; K S Houschyar; X Yin; S Mouraret; J B Brunski; J A Helms
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Hassan Maghaireh; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

Review 3.  Methodological quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews about loading time of multiple dental implants in totally or partially edentulous patients: An umbrella systematic review.

Authors:  Clovis Marinho Carvalho Heiderich; Tamara Kerber Tedesco; Syrio Simão Netto; Rafael Celestino de Sousa; Sergio Allegrini Júnior; Fausto M Mendes; Thais Gimenez
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2020-10-14

4.  Effects of Immediate and Delayed Loading on the Outcomes of All-on-4 Treatment: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Hossein Najafi; Hakimeh Siadat; Solmaz Akbari; Amirreza Rokn
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-11

5.  Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region.

Authors:  Shinya Homma; Yasushi Makabe; Takuya Sakai; Kenzou Morinaga; Satoru Yokoue; Hirofumi Kido; Yasutomo Yajima
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-03-29

6.  Implant-Supported PMMA Monolithic Full-Arch Rehabilitation with Surgical Computer-Planned Guide and Immediate Provisional: A Case Report with One Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Vincenzo Luca Zizzari; Gianmarco Tacconelli
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-04-01

7.  Comparative evaluation of two types of immediately loaded implants using biomechanical and histomorphometric tests: an animal case study.

Authors:  Mansour Rismanchian; Bijan Movahedian; Navid Khalighinejad; Hamid Badrian; Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Afsaneh Nekouie
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-07-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.