Literature DB >> 18498032

Assessment of cervical lymph node metastases using FDG-PET in patients with head and neck cancer.

Yutaka Yamazaki1, Masaaki Saitoh, Ken-ichi Notani, Kanchu Tei, Yasunori Totsuka, Shu-ichi Takinami, Kakuko Kanegae, Masayuki Inubushi, Nagara Tamaki, Yoshimasa Kitagawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) relative to computed tomography (CT) for detecting metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), and to ascertain the factors that affect this accuracy.
METHODS: A total of 1076 lymph nodes obtained from 35 neck dissections in 26 HNSCC patients who preoperatively underwent both FDG-PET and CT were retrospectively analyzed. For pathological metastatic lymph nodes, the lymph node size (short-axis diameter), the ratio of intranodal tumor deposits, and the size of intranodal tumor deposits (maximum diameter of metastatic foci in each lymph node) were histologically recorded.
RESULTS: Forty-six lymph nodes from 23 neck sides were pathologically diagnosed metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG-PET evaluated individually per neck side were 74%, 92%, 80%, 94%, and 65%, respectively, whereas those of CT were 78%, 58%, 71%, 78%, and 58%, respectively. FDG-PET detected 100% of metastatic lymph nodes > or =10 mm, intranodal tumor deposits > or =9 mm, and intranodal tumor deposits with a ratio >75%, whereas no nodes or tumor deposits smaller than 5 mm were detected. The spatial resolution limitations of FDG-PET were responsible for 16 of 20 (80%) false-negative PET results in lymph nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is a useful tool for preoperative evaluation of the neck because it accurately detects metastatic lymph nodes > or =10 mm and has fewer false-positive cases than CT. The high specificity of FDG-PET for lymph node metastases may play an important role in avoiding unnecessary neck dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18498032     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-007-0097-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  40 in total

1.  The value of PET/CT to assess clinically negative necks.

Authors:  Enver Ozer; Barış Naiboğlu; Ryan Meacham; Cherie Ryoo; Amit Agrawal; David E Schuller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  [Post-therapeutic imaging strategies and follow-up in head and neck malignant tumours].

Authors:  R Aschenbach; D Esser
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  [(18)F]-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of nodal metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and larynx: comparison with CT.

Authors:  Yuko Suenaga; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Tomonori Kanda; Naoki Otsuki; Ken-Ichi Nibu; Ryohei Sasaki; Tomoo Itoh; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  SPECT/CT-guided lymph drainage mapping for the planning of unilateral elective nodal irradiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Pieter D de Veij Mestdagh; Marcel C J Jonker; Wouter V Vogel; Willem H Schreuder; Maarten L Donswijk; W Martin C Klop; Abrahim Al-Mamgani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Computed tomography texture features can discriminate benign from malignant lymphadenopathy in pediatric patients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Alexis M Cahalane; Aoife Kilcoyne; Azadeh Tabari; Shaunagh McDermott; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-02-11

Review 7.  The role of PET/CT in the management of patients affected by head and neck tumors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammaroto; Natale Quartuccio; Alessandro Sindoni; Francesca Di Mauro; Federico Caobelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Design study of a dedicated head and neck cancer PET system.

Authors:  Mohan Li; Brett Yockey; Shiva Abbaszadeh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-08

9.  Comparison of PET imaging with 64Cu-liposomes and 18F-FDG in the 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced hamster buccal pouch model of oral dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lisa M Mahakian; D Gregory Farwell; Hua Zhang; Jai Woong Seo; Brian Poirier; Steven P Tinling; Alaa M Afify; Eric M Haynam; David Shaye; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  PET-CT staging of the neck in cancers of the oropharynx: patterns of regional and retropharyngeal nodal metastasis.

Authors:  Marcie Tauzin; Amy Rabalais; Joseph L Hagan; Charles G Wood; Robert L Ferris; Rohan R Walvekar
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.