Literature DB >> 18497614

Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice: a systematic review of the evidence.

Casper Claudius1, Jørgen Viby-Mogensen.   

Abstract

This systematic review describes the evidence on the use of acceleromyography for perioperative neuromuscular monitoring in clinical practice and research. The review documents that although acceleromyography is widely used in research, it cannot be used interchangeably with mechanomyography and electromyography for construction of dose-response curves or for recording different pharmacodynamic variables after injection of a neuromuscular blocking agent. Some studies indicate that it may be beneficial to use a preload to increase the precision of acceleromyography, and to "normalize" the train-of-four ratio to decrease the bias in relation to mechanomyography and electromyography. However, currently the evidence is insufficient to support the routine clinical use of preload and "normalization." In contrast, there is good evidence that acceleromyography improves detection of postoperative residual paralysis. A train-of-four ratio of 1.0 predicts with a high predictive value recovery of pulmonary and upper airway function from neuromuscular blockade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18497614     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318173f62f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  23 in total

1.  Mindray 3-directional NMT Module (a new generation "Tri-axial" neuromuscular monitor) versus the Relaxometer mechanomyograph and versus the TOF-Watch SX acceleromyograph.

Authors:  Ashraf A Dahaba; Ismet Suljevic; Zhao Yang Xiao; Kun Wang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Survey of muscle relaxant effects management with a kinemyographic-based data archiving system: a retrospective quantitative and contextual quality control approach.

Authors:  Cyrus Motamed; Jean Louis Bourgain; Alain D'Hollander
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Philips Intellivue NMT module: precision and performance improvements to meet the clinical requirements of neuromuscular block management.

Authors:  Virginie Dubois; Guillaume Fostier; Marie Dutrieux; Jacques Jamart; Stéphanie Collet; Clothilde de Dorlodot; Philippe Eloy; Philippe E Dubois
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  An Evaluation of the State of Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring Devices.

Authors:  Hannah Christine Hund; Mark John Rice; Jesse Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Philips Intellivue NMT module: variability of initial measurements.

Authors:  Alexandre Stouffs; Arni Ibsen; Jacques Jamart; Virginie Dubois; Philippe E Dubois
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Neuromuscular monitoring: an update.

Authors:  Mădălina Duţu; Robert Ivaşcu; Oana Tudorache; Darius Morlova; Alina Stanca; Silvius Negoiţă; Dan Corneci
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2018-04

7.  Efficiency of the TOF-Cuff™ for the evaluation of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block and its reversal with sugammadex: a comparative study vs. acceleromyography.

Authors:  Yasuhito Kameyama; Shunichi Takagi; Katsuhisa Seto; Ichie Kajiwara; Miori Goto; Osamu Kitajima; Takahiro Suzuki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Residual Paralysis: Does it Influence Outcome After Ambulatory Surgery?

Authors:  Hassan Farhan; Ingrid Moreno-Duarte; Duncan McLean; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2014-12

Review 9.  [Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Nitzschke; N Hansen-Algenstaedt; J Regelsberger; A E Goetz; M S Goepfert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Monitoring of intense neuromuscular blockade in a pig model.

Authors:  Matias V Madsen; Anders M Donatsky; Bente R Jensen; Jacob Rosenberg; Karsten P Hammelev; Mona R Gätke
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.