Literature DB >> 11313175

Randomised phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (DOXIL/CAELYX) versus doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a study by the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.

I Judson1, J A Radford, M Harris, J Y Blay, Q van Hoesel, A le Cesne, A T van Oosterom, M J Clemons, C Kamby, C Hermans, J Whittaker, E Donato di Paola, J Verweij, S Nielsen.   

Abstract

CAELYX/DOXIL, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, has shown antitumour activity and reduced toxicity compared with standard doxorubicin in other tumour types. In this prospective randomised trial, 94 eligible patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) were treated, 50 with CAELYX (50 mg/m(2) by a 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 4 weeks) and 44 with doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2) by an i.v. bolus every 3 weeks). Histological subtypes were evenly matched, 33% were leiomyosarcoma (CAELYX: 18; doxorubicin: 13). Primary disease sites were well matched. CAELYX was significantly less myelosuppressive, only 3 (6%) patients had grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, versus 33 (77%) on doxorubicin; febrile neutropenia occurred in 7 (16%) patients given doxorubicin, but only 1 (2%) given CAELYX. 37 (86%) patients on doxorubicin had grade 2-3 alopecia, but only 3 (6%) on CAELYX, and the major toxicity with CAELYX was to the skin. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia with CAELYX was grade 1: 4 (8%) patients, grade 2: 11 (22%) patients, grade 3: 9 (18%) patients and grade 4: 1 (2%) patient. Other non-haematological grade 3 and 4 toxicities were rare. Confirmed responses were observed with both agents: CAELYX: complete response (CR) 1 (uterine), partial response (PR) 4 (response rate (RR) 10%); and doxorubicin: CR 1, PR 3 (RR of 9%); with the best response being stable disease (NC) in 16 and 18 patients, respectively. The reason for the low response rate is unknown, but it may be due partly to a high proportion of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. In conclusion, CAELYX has equivalent activity to doxorubicin in STS with an improved toxicity profile and should be considered for further investigation in combination with other agents such as ifosfamide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11313175     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00050-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  96 in total

1.  Systematic therapy for unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Sherif S Morgan; Lee D Cranmer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Reduced-Intensity Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Solid Tumors in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients.

Authors:  Nicolas J Llosa; Kenneth R Cooke; Allen R Chen; Christopher J Gamper; Orly R Klein; Elias T Zambidis; Brandon Luber; Gary Rosner; Nicholas Siegel; Mary Jo Holuba; Nancy Robey; Masanori Hayashi; Richard J Jones; Ephraim Fuchs; Matthias Holdhoff; David M Loeb; Heather J Symons
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with ifosfamide in patients with advanced sarcoma: a Spanish group for research on sarcomas (GEIS) study.

Authors:  J Martín-Liberal; A López-Pousa; J Martín Broto; R Cubedo; O Gallego; E Brendel; O M Tirado; X García del Muro
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Megan Meyer; Mahesh Seetharam
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-01-24

5.  Are high drug loading nanoparticles the next step forward for chemotherapy?

Authors:  Joseph Della Rocca; Demin Liu; Wenbin Lin
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.307

6.  Systemic Treatment of Metastatic/Recurrent Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Changing Paradigm.

Authors:  Rebecca C Arend; Michael D Toboni; Allison M Montgomery; Robert A Burger; Alexander B Olawaiye; Bradley J Monk; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-23

7.  Thermal combination therapies for local drug delivery by magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Nicole Hijnen; Esther Kneepkens; Mariska de Smet; Sander Langereis; Edwin Heijman; Holger Grüll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in a subset of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma from a Phase II randomized discontinuation trial.

Authors:  Simon Pacey; Mark J Ratain; Keith T Flaherty; Stanley B Kaye; Lisa Cupit; Eric K Rowinsky; Chenghua Xia; Peter J O'Dwyer; I R Judson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Trabectedin: the evidence for its place in therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Katherine A Thornton
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 10.  Systemic treatment options for radiation-associated sarcomas.

Authors:  Mark A Dickson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.