Literature DB >> 18497360

Neuronal activity of mitral-tufted cells in awake rats during passive and active odorant stimulation.

Romulo A Fuentes1, Marcelo I Aguilar, María L Aylwin, Pedro E Maldonado.   

Abstract

Odorants induce specific modulation of mitral/tufted (MT) cells' firing rate in the mammalian olfactory bulb (OB), inducing temporal patterns of neuronal discharge embedded in an oscillatory local field potential (LFP). While most studies have examined anesthetized animals, little is known about the firing rate and temporal patterns of OB single units and population activity in awake behaving mammals. We examined the firing rate and oscillatory activity of MT cells and LFP signals in behaving rats during two olfactory tasks: passive exposure (PE) and two-alternative (TA) choice discrimination. MT inhibitory responses are predominant in the TA task (76.5%), whereas MT excitatory responses predominate in the PE task (59.2%). Rhythmic discharge in the 12- to 100-Hz range was found in 79.0 and 68.9% of MT cells during PE and TA tasks, respectively. Most odorants presented in PE task increase rhythmic discharges at frequencies >50 Hz, whereas in TA, one of four odorants produced a modest increment <40 Hz. LFP oscillations were clearly modulated by odorants during the TA task, increasing their oscillatory power at frequencies centered at 20 Hz and decreasing power at frequencies >50 Hz. Our results indicate that firing rate responses of MT cells in awake animals are behaviorally modulated with inhibition being a prominent feature of this modulation. The occurrence of oscillatory patterns in single- and multiunitary discharge is also related to stimulation and behavioral context, while the oscillatory patterns of the neuronal population showed a strong dependence on odorant stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18497360     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00095.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  31 in total

1.  A beta oscillation network in the rat olfactory system during a 2-alternative choice odor discrimination task.

Authors:  Leslie M Kay; Jennifer Beshel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Neural and behavioral mechanisms of olfactory perception.

Authors:  Rachel I Wilson
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Precise olfactory responses tile the sniff cycle.

Authors:  Roman Shusterman; Matthew C Smear; Alexei A Koulakov; Dmitry Rinberg
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Behavioral Status Influences the Dependence of Odorant-Induced Change in Firing on Prestimulus Firing Rate.

Authors:  Anan Li; Ethan M Guthman; Wilder T Doucette; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A probabilistic approach to demixing odors.

Authors:  Agnieszka Grabska-Barwińska; Simon Barthelmé; Jeff Beck; Zachary F Mainen; Alexandre Pouget; Peter E Latham
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Sparse incomplete representations: a potential role of olfactory granule cells.

Authors:  Alexei A Koulakov; Dmitry Rinberg
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Effect of Xylazine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam on the Local Field Potential of the Rat Olfactory Bulb.

Authors:  Peter Olegovich Kosenko; Aleksey Borisovich Smolikov; Viktor Borisovich Voynov; Pavel Dmitrievich Shaposhnikov; Anton Igorevich Saevskiy; Valeriy Nikolaevich Kiroy
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 0.982

8.  Broadly tuned and respiration-independent inhibition in the olfactory bulb of awake mice.

Authors:  Brittany N Cazakoff; Billy Y B Lau; Kerensa L Crump; Heike S Demmer; Stephen D Shea
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Balancing the Robustness and Efficiency of Odor Representations during Learning.

Authors:  Monica W Chu; Wankun L Li; Takaki Komiyama
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Licking-induced synchrony in the taste-reward circuit improves cue discrimination during learning.

Authors:  Ranier Gutierrez; Sidney A Simon; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.