Literature DB >> 18496726

Heterogeneous nature and distribution of interruptions in dinucleotides may indicate the existence of biased substitutions underlying microsatellite evolution.

Miguel A Varela1, Roberto Sanmiguel, Ana Gonzalez-Tizon, Andres Martinez-Lage.   

Abstract

Some aspects of microsatellite evolution, such as the role of base substitutions, are far from being fully understood. To examine the significance of base substitutions underlying the evolution of microsatellites we explored the nature and the distribution of interruptions in dinucleotide repeats from the human genome. The frequencies that we inferred in the repetitive sequences were statistically different from the frequencies observed in other noncoding sequences. Additionally, we detected that the interruptions tended to be towards the ends of the microsatellites and 5'-3' asymmetry. In all the estimates nucleotides forming the same repetitive motif seem to be affected by different base substitution rates in AC and AG. This tendency itself could generate patterning and similarity in flanking sequences and reconcile these phenomena with the high mutation rate found in flanking sequences without invoking convergent evolution. Nevertheless, our data suggest that there is a regional bias in the substitution pattern of microsatellites. The accumulation of random substitutions alone cannot explain the heterogeneity and the asymmetry of interruptions found in this study or the relative frequency of different compound microsatellites in the human genome. Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility of a mutational bias leading to convergent or parallel evolution in flanking sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18496726     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-008-9107-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  26 in total

1.  Compound microsatellite repeats: practical and theoretical features.

Authors:  L N Bull; C R Pabón-Peña; N B Freimer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Heterogeneous mutation processes in human microsatellite DNA sequences.

Authors:  H Ellegren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Is there evidence for convergent evolution around human microsatellites?

Authors:  Matthew T Webster; Jonas Hagberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Conservation and evolution of (CT)n/(GA)n microsatellite sequences at orthologous positions in diverse mammalian genomes.

Authors:  R L Stallings
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Mutation of human short tandem repeats.

Authors:  J L Weber; C Wong
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites.

Authors:  C Dib; S Fauré; C Fizames; D Samson; N Drouot; A Vignal; P Millasseau; S Marc; J Hazan; E Seboun; M Lathrop; G Gyapay; J Morissette; J Weissenbach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mutation rate varies among alleles at a microsatellite locus: phylogenetic evidence.

Authors:  L Jin; C Macaubas; J Hallmayer; A Kimura; E Mignot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations.

Authors:  S Kruglyak; R T Durrett; M D Schug; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evolution of the cryptic FMR1 CGG repeat.

Authors:  E E Eichler; C B Kunst; K A Lugenbeel; O A Ryder; D Davison; S T Warren; D L Nelson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Deterministic mutation rate variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Matthew T Webster; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mutation biases and mutation rate variation around very short human microsatellites revealed by human-chimpanzee-orangutan genomic sequence alignments.

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Evidence for nonindependent evolution of adjacent microsatellites in the human genome.

Authors:  Miguel A Varela; William Amos
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Transfer of genetic therapy across human populations: molecular targets for increasing patient coverage in repeat expansion diseases.

Authors:  Miguel A Varela; Helen J Curtis; Andrew G L Douglas; Suzan M Hammond; Aisling J O'Loughlin; Maria J Sobrido; Janine Scholefield; Matthew J A Wood
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Polymorphism of CAG repeats in androgen receptor of carnivores.

Authors:  Qin Wang; Xiuyue Zhang; Xiaofang Wang; Bo Zeng; Xiaodong Jia; Rong Hou; Bisong Yue
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  DNA slippage occurs at microsatellite loci without minimal threshold length in humans: a comparative genomic approach.

Authors:  Sébastien Leclercq; Eric Rivals; Philippe Jarne
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Expansion of microsatellites on evolutionary young Y chromosome.

Authors:  Eduard Kejnovský; Monika Michalovova; Pavlina Steflova; Iva Kejnovska; Susana Manzano; Roman Hobza; Zdenek Kubat; Jan Kovarik; Manuel Jamilena; Boris Vyskot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Non-LTR retrotransposons and microsatellites: Partners in genomic variation.

Authors:  Fiorella C Grandi; Wenfeng An
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2013-07-11

8.  Microsatellite interruptions stabilize primate genomes and exist as population-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms within individual human genomes.

Authors:  Guruprasad Ananda; Suzanne E Hile; Amanda Breski; Yanli Wang; Yogeshwar Kelkar; Kateryna D Makova; Kristin A Eckert
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.917

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.