Literature DB >> 18496182

Risk of aneurysmal rupture: the importance of neck orifice positioning-assessment using computational flow simulation.

Tomotaka Ohshima1, Shigeru Miyachi, Ken-Ichi Hattori, Ichiro Takahashi, Katsuya Ishii, Takashi Izumi, Jun Yoshida.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to clarify the risk of rupture in terminal-type intracranial aneurysms using computational flow simulation analysis.
METHODS: First, idealized three-dimensional aneurysmal models were built from a solid voxel on the computer. We focused on round terminal-type aneurysms with the positioning of the neck orifice set according to the following three patterns in relationship to the axis of the parent artery: the Type-A neck orifice was positioned directly in line with the flow of the parent artery; the Type-B neck orifice was shifted 1.5 mm offline toward the unilateral branch; and the Type-C neck orifice was shifted 3 mm offline. Computational flow simulations were applied with Fujitsu alpha-Flow software (Fujitusu, Tokyo, Japan). We analyzed flow patterns using modified patient-specific models. We also investigated actual clinical situations to evaluate the differences in neck-orifice positioning between 20 ruptured aneurysms and 26 unruptured ones using three-dimensional angiograms.
RESULTS: The Type-A neck orifice showed completely symmetrical stream lines in the aneurysm, whereas the Type-C orifice showed a clear round circulation. The Type-B neck orifice, on the other hand, exhibited intra-aneurysmal flow separation. The clinical research demonstrated that Type-B aneurysms were more likely to be found in the ruptured group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Flow separation, recognized as one of the causes of intimal injury, could be observed only in Type-B aneurysms, a result that corresponded well with our clinical experience. From the flow-dynamics point of view, this positioning of the neck orifice may be one of the risk factors most likely to induce the rupture of unruptured aneurysms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18496182     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000318160.59848.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  10 in total

Review 1.  Computational fluid dynamics in brain aneurysms.

Authors:  Daniel M Sforza; Christopher M Putman; Juan R Cebral
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 2.  Physical factors effecting cerebral aneurysm pathophysiology.

Authors:  Chander Sadasivan; David J Fiorella; Henry H Woo; Baruch B Lieber
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Improved microsurgical creation of venous pouch arterial bifurcation aneurysms in rabbits.

Authors:  C Sherif; S Marbacher; S Erhardt; J Fandino
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  In vivo hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms obtained by magnetic resonance fluid dynamics (MRFD) based on time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Haruo Isoda; Yasuhide Ohkura; Takashi Kosugi; Masaya Hirano; Hiroyasu Takeda; Hisaya Hiramatsu; Shuhei Yamashita; Yasuo Takehara; Marcus T Alley; Roland Bammer; Norbert J Pelc; Hiroki Namba; Harumi Sakahara
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Haruo Isoda; Yasuhide Ohkura; Takashi Kosugi; Masaya Hirano; Marcus T Alley; Roland Bammer; Norbert J Pelc; Hiroki Namba; Harumi Sakahara
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  Suggested connections between risk factors of intracranial aneurysms: a review.

Authors:  Juan R Cebral; Marcelo Raschi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Differences between middle cerebral artery bifurcations with normal anatomy and those with aneurysms.

Authors:  Takashi Sadatomo; Kiyoshi Yuki; Keisuke Migita; Yasutaka Imada; Masashi Kuwabara; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Aneurysm shape reconstruction from biplane angiograms in the ISUIA collection.

Authors:  Madhavan L Raghavan; Gaurav V Sharda; John Huston; J Mocco; Ana W Capuano; James C Torner; Punam K Saha; Irene Meissner; Robert D Brown
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Simulation of intra-aneurysmal blood flow by different numerical methods.

Authors:  Frank Weichert; Lars Walczak; Denis Fisseler; Tobias Opfermann; Mudassar Razzaq; Raphael Münster; Stefan Turek; Iris Grunwald; Christian Roth; Christian Veith; Mathias Wagner
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Assessment of endovascular coil configuration for embolization of intracranial aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Tomotaka Ohshima; Shigeru Miyachi; Ichiro Takahashi; Katsuya Ishii
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.131

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.