PURPOSE: To characterize the relationship between radiation pneumonitis (RP) clinical symptoms and pulmonary metabolic activity on post-treatment [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 101 esophageal cancer patients who underwent restaging FDG-PET/computed tomography imaging 3-12 weeks after completing thoracic radiotherapy. The National Institutes of Health Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3, was used to score the RP clinical symptoms. Linear regression was applied to the FDG-PET/computed tomography images to determine the normalized FDG uptake vs. radiation dose. The pulmonary metabolic radiation response (PMRR) was quantified as this slope. Modeling was performed to determine the interaction of PMRR, mean lung dose (MLD), and the percentage of lung receiving >20 Gy with RP outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients, 25 had Grade 0, 10 had Grade 1, 60 had Grade 2, 5 had Grade 3, and 1 had Grade 5 RP symptoms. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that increased values of both MLD and PMRR were associated with a greater probability of RP clinical symptoms (p = 0.032 and p = 0.033, respectively). Spearman's rank correlation found no association between the PMRR and the dosimetric parameters (planning target volume, MLD, percentage of lung receiving >5-30 Gy). Twofold cross-validation demonstrated that the combination of MLD and PMRR was superior to either alone for assessing the development of clinical RP symptoms. The combined MLD (or percentage of lung receiving >20 Gy) and PMRR had a greater sensitivity and accuracy (53.3% and 62.5%, respectively) than either alone. CONCLUSION: The results of this study have demonstrated a significant correlation between RP clinical symptoms and the PMRR measured by FDG-PET/computed tomography after thoracic radiotherapy.
PURPOSE: To characterize the relationship between radiation pneumonitis (RP) clinical symptoms and pulmonary metabolic activity on post-treatment [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 101 esophageal cancerpatients who underwent restaging FDG-PET/computed tomography imaging 3-12 weeks after completing thoracic radiotherapy. The National Institutes of Health Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3, was used to score the RP clinical symptoms. Linear regression was applied to the FDG-PET/computed tomography images to determine the normalized FDG uptake vs. radiation dose. The pulmonary metabolic radiation response (PMRR) was quantified as this slope. Modeling was performed to determine the interaction of PMRR, mean lung dose (MLD), and the percentage of lung receiving >20 Gy with RP outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients, 25 had Grade 0, 10 had Grade 1, 60 had Grade 2, 5 had Grade 3, and 1 had Grade 5 RP symptoms. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that increased values of both MLD and PMRR were associated with a greater probability of RP clinical symptoms (p = 0.032 and p = 0.033, respectively). Spearman's rank correlation found no association between the PMRR and the dosimetric parameters (planning target volume, MLD, percentage of lung receiving >5-30 Gy). Twofold cross-validation demonstrated that the combination of MLD and PMRR was superior to either alone for assessing the development of clinical RP symptoms. The combined MLD (or percentage of lung receiving >20 Gy) and PMRR had a greater sensitivity and accuracy (53.3% and 62.5%, respectively) than either alone. CONCLUSION: The results of this study have demonstrated a significant correlation between RP clinical symptoms and the PMRR measured by FDG-PET/computed tomography after thoracic radiotherapy.
Authors: Rodney J Hicks; Michael P Mac Manus; Jane P Matthews; Annette Hogg; David Binns; Danny Rischin; David L Ball; Lester J Peters Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M Roach; D R Gandara; H S Yuo; P S Swift; S Kroll; D C Shrieve; W M Wara; L Margolis; T L Phillips Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J A Ajani; R Komaki; J B Putnam; G Walsh; J Nesbitt; P W Pisters; P M Lynch; A Vaporciyan; R Smythe; S Lahoti; I Raijman; S Swisher; F D Martin; J A Roth Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M V Graham; J A Purdy; B Emami; W Harms; W Bosch; M A Lockett; C A Perez Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M S Anscher; F M Kong; K Andrews; R Clough; L B Marks; G Bentel; R L Jirtle Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1998-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: S L Kwa; J V Lebesque; J C Theuws; L B Marks; M T Munley; G Bentel; D Oetzel; U Spahn; M V Graham; R E Drzymala; J A Purdy; A S Lichter; M K Martel; R K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1998-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jeffrey D Bradley; Andrew Hope; Issam El Naqa; Aditya Apte; Patricia E Lindsay; Walter Bosch; John Matthews; William Sause; Mary V Graham; Joseph O Deasy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Andy Trotti; A Dimitrios Colevas; Ann Setser; Valerie Rusch; David Jaques; Volker Budach; Corey Langer; Barbara Murphy; Richard Cumberlin; C Norman Coleman; Philip Rubin Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Michael Christensen; Jonathan D Cheng; Jian Q Yu; Kevin Crawford; Oleh Haluszka; Jeffrey Tokar; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Alan Maurer; Gary M Freedman Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Robert Jeraj; Yue Cao; Randall K Ten Haken; Carol Hahn; Lawrence Marks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy; Quentin Diot; Bernard Jones; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Jennifer Kwak; Daniel Bowles; Inga Grills; Nicholas Myziuk; Thomas Guerrero; Craig Stevens; Tracey Schefter; Laurie E Gaspar; Brian Kavanagh; Moyed Miften; Chad Rusthoven Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mike E Robbins; Judy K Brunso-Bechtold; Ann M Peiffer; Christina I Tsien; Janet E Bailey; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Thomas Guerrero; Josue Martinez; Matthew R McCurdy; Michael Wolski; Mary Francis McAleer Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Matthew McCurdy; Derek P Bergsma; Eric Hyun; Thomas Kim; Enid Choi; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Thomas Guerrero Journal: J Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-06-01
Authors: Michael MacManus; Sarah Everitt; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; X Allen Li; Ursula Nestle; Feng-Ming Spring Kong Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2017-12