Literature DB >> 18494955

The patient movement as an emancipation movement.

Charlotte Williamson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To suggest that the patient movement is an emancipation movement.
BACKGROUND: The patient movement is young and fragmented; and it can seem confusing because it lacks an explicit ideology with intellectual and theoretical underpinnings.
METHODS: Drawing mainly on the experiences and the published writings of patient activists, the author identified eight aspects of the patient movement that could be compared with aspects of recognized emancipation movements: the radicalization of activists; the creation of new knowledge; the identification of guiding principles; the sense of direction; the unmasking of new issues; schisms within the movement and allies outside it; and the gradual social acceptance of some of the ideas (here standards of health care) that activists work to promote.
RESULTS: Similarities between certain aspects of the patient movement and of the recognized emancipation movements were close.
CONCLUSION: The patient movement can be regarded as an emancipation movement, albeit an immature one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18494955      PMCID: PMC5060437          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00475.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  20 in total

Review 1.  Reforming gendered health care: an assessment of change.

Authors:  M K Zimmerman; S A Hill
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.663

2.  Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge.

Authors:  S Epstein
Journal:  Med Soc (Berkeley)       Date:  1996

Review 3.  'Health for me': a sociocultural analysis of healthism in the middle classes.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Simon Wessely
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Social movements in health: an introduction.

Authors:  Phil Brown; Stephen Zavestoski
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2004-09

5.  Commercial influence and the content of medical journals.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Donald W Light
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-17

6.  Ethical debate. Truth, the first casualty. Deadly charades.

Authors:  M Blennerhassett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-20

7.  The rhetoric of informed choice: perspectives from midwives on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.

Authors:  Carol Hindley; Ann M Thomson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care.

Authors:  Helen Stapleton; Mavis Kirkham; Gwenan Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

9.  Reflections on health care consumerism: insights from feminism.

Authors:  Charlotte Williamson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Health consumer groups in the UK: a new social movement?

Authors:  Judith Allsop; Kathryn Jones; Rob Baggott
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2004-09
View more
  8 in total

1.  The emancipation of patients: a theory whose time has come.

Authors:  Charlotte Williamson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Patient-expert partnerships in research: how to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives.

Authors:  Janneke E Elberse; J Francisca Caron-Flinterman; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Representing Whom? U.K. Health Consumer and Patients' Organizations in the Policy Process.

Authors:  Rob Baggott; Kathryn L Jones
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 4.  Care planning for long-term conditions – a concept mapping.

Authors:  Monique Lhussier; Simon Eaton; Natalie Forster; Mathew Thomas; Sue Roberts; Susan M Carr
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Problematization of perspectives on health promotion and empowerment in mental health nursing--within the research network "MeHNuRse" and the Horatio conference, 2012.

Authors:  Patrik D Jönsson; Håkan Nunstedt; Inger J Berglund; Britt H Ahlström; Birgitta Hedelin; Ingela Skärsäter; Henrika Jormfeldt
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2014-04-08

6.  The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations.

Authors:  Helene Gerhards; Karin Jongsma; Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  eHealth program to empower patients in returning to normal activities and work after gynecological surgery: intervention mapping as a useful method for development.

Authors:  Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Judith A F Huirne; Carina A Pittens; Willem van Mechelen; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Hans A M Brölmann; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Overall scores as an alternative to global ratings in patient experience surveys; a comparison of four methods.

Authors:  Maarten W Krol; Dolf de Boer; Jany J D J M Rademakers; Diana M Delnoij
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.