Literature DB >> 1849427

Histone hyperacetylation does not alter the positioning or stability of phased nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat.

E H Bresnick1, S John, G L Hager.   

Abstract

Activation of mouse mammary tumor virus transcription by the hormone-bound glucocorticoid receptor results in disruption of a nucleosome that is specifically positioned on the promoter. Limited treatment of cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate prevents receptor-dependent promoter activation and nucleosome disruption [Bresnick, E. H., John, S., Berard, D. S., LeFebvre, P., & Hager, G. L. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 3977-3981]. On the basis of this observation, we undertook a series of experiments to compare the structure of normal and hyperacetylated mouse mammary tumor virus chromatin. Although butyrate prevents hormone-induced restriction enzyme cutting specifically in the B nucleosome region, chromatin containing hyperacetylated histones does not differ from normal chromatin in general sensitivity to restriction enzymes. Indirect end-labeling analysis of micrococcal nuclease digested chromatin reveals that nucleosomes are identically phased on the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat in normal and hyperacetylated chromatin. A synthetic DNA fragment spanning the B nucleosome region was reconstituted into a monosome by using core particles containing normal or hyperacetylated histones. Analysis of the structure of reconstituted monosomes by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, salt stability, thermal stability, restriction enzyme accessibility, and exonuclease III or DNase I footprinting reveals no effect of histone hyperacetylation on monosome structure. These observations suggest that histone hyperacetylation does not induce a major change in the structure of mouse mammary tumor virus chromatin, such as nucleosome unfolding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1849427     DOI: 10.1021/bi00228a020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  15 in total

1.  Histone acetylation at promoters is differentially affected by specific activators and repressors.

Authors:  J Deckert; K Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Nutritional regulation of nucleosomal structure at the chicken malic enzyme promoter in liver.

Authors:  X J Ma; A G Goodridge
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Effects of histone acetylation on chromatin topology in vivo.

Authors:  L C Lutter; L Judis; R F Paretti
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The transcriptionally-active MMTV promoter is depleted of histone H1.

Authors:  E H Bresnick; M Bustin; V Marsaud; H Richard-Foy; G L Hager
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Disruption of higher-order folding by core histone acetylation dramatically enhances transcription of nucleosomal arrays by RNA polymerase III.

Authors:  C Tse; T Sera; A P Wolffe; J C Hansen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Synergism between hypersensitive sites confers long-range gene activation by the beta-globin locus control region.

Authors:  E H Bresnick; L Tze
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Histone chaperones, histone acetylation, and the fluidity of the chromogenome.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Hansen; Jennifer K Nyborg; Karolin Luger; Laurie A Stargell
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 8.  Minireview: role of kinases and chromatin remodeling in progesterone signaling to chromatin.

Authors:  Guillermo P Vicent; A Silvina Nacht; Roser Zaurín; Cecilia Ballaré; Jaime Clausell; Miguel Beato
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-05-19

9.  Nucleosome positioning at the replication fork.

Authors:  R Lucchini; R E Wellinger; J M Sogo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  Erk signaling and chromatin remodeling in MMTV promoter activation by progestins.

Authors:  Guillermo P Vicent; Roser Zaurin; Cecilia Ballaré; A Silvina Nacht; Miguel Beato
Journal:  Nucl Recept Signal       Date:  2009-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.